censorship
Elon Musk Announces General Amnesty BUT Twitter T&C’s Say ‘Denial Of Violent Events’ Will Not Be Tolerated
Did Musk mean to write ‘being Alex Jones will not be tolerated’?
Published
2 months agoon
Steve Watson

Following the result of another Twitter poll indicating that over 70% want to see a general amnesty for suspended Twitter users, Elon Musk has announced that it will begin next week, but it appears there are some major caveats.
Musk again said “the people have spoken,” and used the Latin phrase “vox populi, vox dei,” meaning “the voice of the people is the voice of God”.
The people have spoken.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 24, 2022
Amnesty begins next week.
Vox Populi, Vox Dei.
It means that accounts that didn’t break the law or spam egregiously will be reinstated, according to Musk.
The amnesty announcement immediately triggered the media into declaring that a bunch of ‘online safety experts’ are warning that “lives are at risk.”
This article is activism masquerading as journalism. https://t.co/1NxvNpD7UN
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) November 25, 2022
The overlord experts are panicking about “a rise in harassment, hate speech and misinformation.”
I see Twitter's former ThoughtCops are now masquerading as "experts" https://t.co/lBtn3ND3MT
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) November 24, 2022
Who are these experts, and who told ABC that they're the judge and jury of "harassment, hate speech and misinformation." https://t.co/GxK2OPlDRd
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) November 24, 2022
Activists warn lives at risk over Elon Musk's amnesty plans for suspended Twitter accounts https://t.co/z3hmuv7FIj
— Axios (@axios) November 25, 2022
Much Ado About Nothing
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 25, 2022
New Twitter owner Elon Musk said he is granting "amnesty” for suspended accounts, which online safety experts predict will spur a rise in harassment, hate speech and misinformation. https://t.co/aZ0NyUP7Fp
— The Associated Press (@AP) November 24, 2022
But you have piqued my curiosity … who are these “online experts” you speak of?
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 25, 2022
At the same time this was all unfolding, Musk tweeted out several posts regarding ‘hate speech’.
This is simply based on the same list of terms that Twitter has used for some time, so ceteris paribus
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 25, 2022
It is now clear that those terms were, shall we say, somewhat broad. So will they all remain in place after the amnesty?
It isn’t clear.
And then there is this…
To clarify, if this is a new policy—or at least explicitly mentions examples, I personally support it. That doesn’t mean it can’t be questioned though! I’m interested in what you think.
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) November 24, 2022
This just led to more questions…
Is this really new? Did Musk add this?
1) the rule (I'm told) is not new (hence wasn't added by Elon Musk)
— Logic Geometry, Information (@LGcommaI) November 25, 2022
2) the rule is unbearably weak and vague (compare https://t.co/UTNytjLHKT).
August 4th 2022https://t.co/sc0U0HrG5U
— Mr. Minarchy 🐊 (@community_notes) November 25, 2022
So nothing changed?
— Not a cat (@TommyApples80) November 25, 2022
What does it actually mean?
Well stated.
— Just Lyra (@Zero2Crow) November 25, 2022
I want to know who decides what the official versions are, also.
*event
— Gretchen Casey (@SheWhoCarries) November 25, 2022
I agree with numbers one and three. Not the center one (2). there's nothing wrong with thinking something didn't happen the way the media says it did and we're allowed legally to question everything.
— TracyRose1990 (@Rose1990Tracy) November 25, 2022
Yeah I'm gonna continue to believe we were sold a huge lie on what happened on 9/11. Just like JFK. Should we add JFK to this list? USS Liberty? Are we to believe that government or entity is able to come up with this list?
— Peeps (@TheOGPeeps) November 25, 2022
Slippery slope. What constitutes "9/11 denial", for example? Flat out rldenying it happened, or questioning who was behind it and other things, like bldg 7?
— John Nada (@J0HN_NADA) November 25, 2022
I’m not a fan. Not that I’m for “denying” historical events but “denial” can be subjective and people taking ridiculous and easily disproved stances should be subjected to appropriate ridicule publicly as opposed to being banned thereby rendering their views “mysterious”.
— Publius 🏴🇩🇪✝️ (@jbtrauth) November 25, 2022
I don't understand this policy. JFK conspiracy videos are a staple of normie TV. Why is that OK to question? I don't think the 9/11 official story is true. I don't know what is – but am I not allowed to think that or express it if it comes up? Why?
— Beer Hall Pooch (@ColmKearney7) November 25, 2022
So we can't talk conspiracy theories?
— Taylor 🏴☠️ (@Masteroffuckits) November 24, 2022
That’s what Alex Jones said the other day. It’s freedom of speech according to the new boss, same as the old boss I guess
— Lucky_130 (@Lucky13014) November 24, 2022
Let’s be real, @elonmusk meant to write “being alex jones”.
— mars (@dumsoup) November 25, 2022
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.
Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, we urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————
You may like
-
Illegal Immigrants in UK Given Free Debit Cards
-
Jordan Peterson Calls For Regime Change in Iran
-
Video: Kamala Harris Lambasted For Weird Cringe Kindergarten Description Of Astronauts’ Historic Mission
-
Video: Belarusian Tennis Star Calls Out Sports Reporters For “Dragging Players Into” Ukraine Conflict Talk
-
Segregation Is Back: Canadian Theatre Running ‘Black Only’ Events
-
News Outlets Announce They’re Abandoning “Objectivity” Because It’s Racist
censorship
News Outlets Announce They’re Abandoning “Objectivity” Because It’s Racist
A relic of “white newsrooms”.

Published
19 hours agoon
1 February, 2023
Top news outlets have openly announced that they’re abandoning “objectivity” because it’s a racist relic of “white newsrooms”.
No, this isn’t a Babylon Bee story.
The decision arose from a series of interviews conducted by former executive editor for The Washington Post Leonard Downie Jr. and former CBS News President Andrew Heyward.
“The media figures argued that journalists should include their own beliefs, biases, and experiences to convey truth, and that journalistic objectivity was either unrealistic or undesirable,” reports the Daily Caller.
Downie Jr. argued that objectivity distorts the news because the standard “was dictated over decades by male editors in predominantly White newsrooms and reinforced their own view of the world.”
Emilio Garcia-Ruiz, editor-in-chief at the San Francisco Chronicle, put it even more explicitly asserting, “objectivity has got to go.”
So there you have it.
“Diversity” is hostile to objectivity (truth) and for diversity to win, the truth must be abolished in favor of pushing narratives that benefit so-called minority groups (which are now endorsed and empowered by every major institution in America).
Downie Jr. insisted that covering both sides of a story, particularly one “about race, the treatment of women, LGBTQ+ rights, income inequality, climate change and many other subjects,” prevents individuals who belong to such groups “pursuing truth in their work.”
Kathleen Carroll, former executive editor at the Associated Press asserted that objectivity was a standard set by “White, educated, and fairly wealthy” people and should therefore be abolished.
Chris Menahan pointed out one such example of how journalists dispensing with objectivity actually serves to bury the truth.
The New York Times reported the claim of a 12-year-old girl being racially bullied by referring to her as “Black” and her bullies as “White”.
After it emerged that the claims had been totally invented and the story was a lie, they removed both “Black” and “White” from subsequent reporting of the story.
https://www.informationliberation.com/files/how-nyt-covered-dreadlocks-hate-hoax-1.jpg
“What we found has convinced us that truth-seeking news media must move beyond whatever ‘objectivity’ once meant to produce more trustworthy news,” said Downie Jr., obfuscating the fact that jettisoning objectivity actually achieves the exact opposite of “truth-seeking”.
“Their statements are all objectively idiotic but they don’t even realize it because they’ve abandoned all objectivity!” remarked Menahan.
As we previously highlighted, fact-checking institute Poynter demanded that local news stations reduce coverage of stories that connect “Black and brown communities” to violent crime because it is fueling “systemic racism.”
They are literally at war with truth.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behind the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.
———————————————————————————————————————
censorship
German Public Broadcaster Hides Migrant Background of Terrorist to ‘Preserve Democracy’
More concerned about preventing “racism and xenophobia” than telling the truth.

Published
3 days agoon
30 January, 2023
A major German public broadcaster revealed that it had deliberately avoided mentioning the migrant background of a terrorist who killed two teenagers in order to prevent racism and ‘preserve democracy’.
A 33-year-old asylum seeker was arrested last week after murdering a 17-year-old girl and a 19-year-old man during a frenzied knife attack on a regional train service near the town of Brokstedt which left several others injured.
The culprit was described as a “stateless” Palestinian who had been living in Germany since 2014.
Ibrahim A., who had been working as an Amazon delivery driver, had numerous previous convictions and was released from pre-trial detention despite having threatened people with a knife in 2021.
Even the suspect’s own lawyer said he was surprised that Ibrahim had been released on January 19th.
With the German public reeling from yet another terror attack carried out by a migrant who had entered the country illegally, top broadcaster NDR was seemingly more concerned about maintaining politically correct narratives.
After Norddeutscher Rundfunk refused to detail the migrant background of the perpetrator, social media users called out the broadcaster for censoring the story.
NDR then ludicrously claimed that “the origin of the perpetrator is not relevant to the report” and that even mentioning such detail “leads to discriminatory generalizations or misinterpretations” and that “ridding our pages of racism and xenophobia” was more important.
The broadcaster’s final absurd claim, before they closed comments on the story entirely, was to assert that hiding the true background of the terrorist was “not censorship, but preservation of democracy,” a phrase which sounds like it was lifted directly from George Orwell’s 1984.
Striking a similar tone, regional interior minister Sabine Sütterlin-Waack demanded that “no room should be given to assumptions and speculations that are currently being circulated” on social media.
“This is not the first time the German establishment media has been taken to task over omitting facts from reportage some consider important context for helping the public build an informed opinion on the events of the day,” writes Oliver JJ Lane.
“Public broadcaster Tagesschau was criticised after their coverage of New Year’s Eve riots this year omitted the overwhelmingly migrant character of those known to be involved.”
Lane points out that top German news outlets also refused to report on the infamous mass molestation of women by migrant men in Cologne on New Year’s Eve 2015 until it became an international scandal.
As we previously highlighted, German media outlets responded to violent riots in Sweden last year mainly involving Muslim migrants by falsely claiming the unrest occurred as a result of “right-wing demos.”
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behind the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.
———————————————————————————————————————
censorship
Video: Leftist Talking Heads Claim Letting Trump Back On Facebook Will “Destroy Democracy”
“Do you want to be that institution that really helps take down the country?”
Published
6 days agoon
27 January, 2023Steve Watson

Reacting to the news that Facebook is to allow President Trump access to its platform after a two year ban, leftist ‘journalists’ on MSNBC claimed that it will “destroy democracy”.
Trump derangement syndrome is well and truly back, with New York Times editor Mara Gay, Lincoln Project co-founder George Conway, and historian Jon Meacham crying about Meta helping to “take down the country” by allowing Trump to return.
Conway said “They think, ‘Well oh, the fire’s out, so even though this guy has a cache of matches and gasoline that he carries around with him, let’s let him just play with matches again.”
Meacham described Facebook’s decision on Trump as a “devil’s bargain” claiming that Meta needs more money and Trump needs to gain relevance again.
“If you are one of these companies, do you want to be the means by which an autocrat mounts an assault on the Constitution itself?” he added.
Gay chimed in “As a country or as a company, you don’t want to hand over the keys to democracy to have someone destroy that democracy. Do you want to be that institution that really helps take down the country?”
She went on to compare Meta’s decision to reinstate Trump to chemical companies pushing for wars so they can sell weapons.
NYT's @MaraGay on Meta reinstating Trump: "Do you want to be that institution that really helps take down the country?" pic.twitter.com/43RCDjOQRA
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) January 26, 2023
More video below:
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.
Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, we urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————
Trending
-
clownworld3 days ago
London Police Recruiting Illiterate Officers Who Can Barely Write English to Meet Diversity Quotas
-
LGBT3 days ago
Video: Mother Reads Shocking Gay Porn Material Found In Minnesota School Direct To Board Members
-
LGBT7 days ago
Wisconsin Parents Outraged After Finding ‘Queer’ Porn In Children’s School Library
-
World at War6 days ago
Croatian President Calls Germany’s ‘We Are at War With Russia’ Comment “Madness”
-
censorship19 hours ago
News Outlets Announce They’re Abandoning “Objectivity” Because It’s Racist
-
U.S. News7 days ago
Video: Rand Paul Warns Overclassification Being Used To Cover Up COVID Lab Leak
-
Politics6 days ago
Biden Jokes About People Thinking He’s “Stupid” Then Makes Another Stupid Verbal Gaffe
-
censorship7 days ago
They Buried It