Lefty ‘philosopher’ Sam Harris, who previously admitted he supported the suppression of reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop immediately prior to the election, has now claimed that the New York Post’s reporting on the story was accurate only “by accident.”

'Hunter Biden could have had the corpses of children in his basement. I would not have cared.'

Sam Harris on the suppression of Biden laptop news on the eve of the election. https://t.co/FnzU8FfXat

— Pandem(on)ical Order of Good Cheer (@EmpireinWinter) November 22, 2022

Speaking with Bill Maher on his podcast, Harris declared that the reaction to him saying he wouldn’t have cared if Hunter Biden had corpses of children in his basement was “right wing lunacy,” and that it “kind of distorted my position.”

Harris further declared that “the velocity of the hatred was something new,” and claimed that “it was completely plausible to worry that this was a fake story… there simply wasn’t enough time to get to the bottom of it.”

Maher challenged him on the suppression of the laptop story, noting “Well then why did the outlets that did get to the bottom of it, get to it? The New York Post had no problem getting to the bottom of it.”

Harris replied, “They wanted to believe it and yes, you know, sometimes you’re right by accident.”

Maher responded, “Can I go to step two of what the two reasonable people in the room would agree on. One, they’d agree it was kind of suppressed. Two, they’d agree that Hunter Biden, being the son of the current Vice President, and being a complete douchebag, was ripe to be used as a conduit to his father, through which he was, but nothing really. It was kind of sort of everyday graft, that’s sleazy, but doesn’t affect the world.”

“It’s possible we still don’t know, right,” Harris replied, adding “I’ll give some credence to the possibility that it’s worse than I understand. But the problem is ten days is not enough to figure that out and we knew that it was going to rail the issue.”

Harris then attempted to steer the conversation to Trump and his administration being more corrupt than Biden.

Watch:

The New York Post story on the Hunter Biden laptop was censored on Twitter and other platforms and labelled ‘Russian disinformation‘ in a chilling example of election meddling fewer than 3 weeks before the vote that saw Biden take the White House.

It has since been proven that the story is completely accurate, with  journalists such as Glenn Greenwald describing the cover up as “the single biggest media fraud” in the past decade.

Harris put himself in the spotlight again this week by criticising Elon Musk’s attempts to restore free speech on Twitter:

Egomaniac Sam Harris has exposed himself again.Last time he said, “I would not care if Hunter Biden had corpses of children in his basement.”This time it’s ‘people can’t be trusted with Free Speech! Speech should be decided by authoritarian platforms and only ‘they’ discern truth https://t.co/t17IF0WLtv

— Rob Schneider (@RobSchneider) November 21, 2022

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

As we discussed last night, Sam Bankman-Fried has now demonstrated that he is both a pathological liar and a sociopath, the kind who in “explaining” to his employees how he stole billions (over $4 billion according to new FTX CEO John J. Ray) from the now bankrupt FTX, an act which left it insolvent and without liquidity, called it “loans” which were “generally” not used for “large amounts of personal consumption” (just “small amounts” used for such trivial items as $40 million penthouses and private jets).

And the only reason we don’t officially call him a criminal just yet, is because he has not yet confirmed he used client money from his exchange to fund his personal hedge fund, an act which would cost any other individual decades in jail… but not prominent democrats like SBF or Jon Corzine, of course. Plus it’s the US legal system’s job to do that, not ours. Although we are growing increasingly skeptical this prominent Democratic donor will ever see the inside of a courtroom.

It’s not just us: with much of the entire world demanding to know how this corpulent 30-year-old still has not been thrown in prison, or at least charged with a variety of crimes, the NYT just confirmed to the entire world what a farce the one-time paper of record has become, and how it is willing to whore itself out for clicks – not to mention prominent Democrat donors – because moments after SBF tweeted that he will be speaking with Andrew Ross-Sorkin moderated NYT “summit” on Nov 30…

I’ll be speaking with @andrewrsorkin at the @dealbook summit next Wednesday (11/30). https://t.co/QocjPtCVvC

— SBF (@SBF_FTX) November 23, 2022

… Sorkin quickly confirmed as much.

A lot of folks have been asking if I would still be interviewing @SBF_FTX at the @nytimes @dealbook Summit on Nov 30…

The answer is yes. 👇

There are a lot of important questions to be asked and answered.

Nothing is off limits.

Looking forward to it… https://t.co/lShAqXLKGS

— Andrew Ross Sorkin (@andrewrsorkin) November 23, 2022

And so, instead of being under arrest, SBF will instead be treated like a luminary alongside other such other Democrat icons as Zelenskyy (who according to some may have been intimately familiar with FTX fund flows in the past year) and of course the woman who along with Ben Bernanke and Jerome Powell, made it all possible by blowing the biggest asset bubble of all time: Janet Yellen.

And while we are certain that the NYT – which we assume is done writing puff pieces on behalf of SBF after it became a laughing stock last week – would be quick to mercilessly cancel and expel from its “prestigious” conference anyone who had misgendered some post-op transsexual, it is willing to give this thieving pathological liar and sociopath a forum in which to profess his innocence to the entire world, and by association with other Democrat “celebrities” such as Bill Clinton.

…  to boost his standing within a legal system that is clearly as much as joke as the venue that he will be sharing with the following individuals:

Here are all the other “top business and policy leaders” at the NYT whitewashing summit:

• Eric Adams, New York City mayor
• Ben Affleck, Artists Equity C.E.O.
• Sam Bankman-Fried, FTX founder
• Gerry Cardinale, RedBird Capital Partners founder, managing partner and C.I.O.
• Shou Chew, TikTok C.E.O.
• Larry Fink, BlackRock chairman and C.E.O.
• Reed Hastings, Netflix founder and co-C.E.O.
• Andy Jassy, Amazon president and C.E.O.
• Van Jones, CNN host, author and Dream.Org founder
• Scarlett Lewis, Jesse Lewis Choose Love Movement founder and mother of Sandy Hook shooting victim, Jesse
• Mike Pence, 48th vice president of the United States and author of “So Help Me God”
• Benjamin Netanyahu, former Prime Minister of Israel, current leader of the Likud party
• Priscilla Sims Brown, Amalgamated Bank president and C.E.O.
• Secretary Janet L. Yellen, U.S. Department of the Treasury
• President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine
• Mark Zuckerberg, Meta founder, chairman and C.E.O.

The shocked, stunned and simply disgusted reactions are still coming in:

“SBF needs to go to jail!”

The New York Times: pic.twitter.com/ynSzdFdl0Q

— Dr. Parik Patel, BA, CFA, ACCA Esq. (@ParikPatelCFA) November 23, 2022

The @nytimes event right? Makes sense. 😂😂😂 https://t.co/mgMhc0YNrA

— Dave Portnoy (@stoolpresidente) November 23, 2022

I’ll be speaking with @SBF_FTX at the @dealbook summit next Wednesday (11/30) by hiding in one of the bathroom stalls and surprising him while he’s using the urinal.

What questions should I ask him?

— davis 🐺🦊 (@basedkarbon) November 23, 2022

How did this dude steal billions of dollars and is now speaking at a summit as a free man?

Make it make sense.

— Chairman (@WSBChairman) November 23, 2022

let's hop on a spaces right now.
Just me and you, 1 on 1.

— Bitcoin Archive 🗄🚀🌔 (@BTC_Archive) November 23, 2022

That CNBC, the NY Times and far-left extremist Andrew Sorkin would be protecting, apologizing for and promoting this guy is zero surprise. https://t.co/xhGh0gePV0

— John Tuld (@BradHuston) November 23, 2022

SORKIN: "Internet trolls are scapegoating Sam, but we should celebrate entrepreneurs even when they fail. There's nothing illegal about taking big risks." https://t.co/mB9KkFsRdt pic.twitter.com/FKyTtdsfl9

— Bitcoin is Saving (@BitcoinIsSaving) November 23, 2022

My theory is that Andrew Sorkin is a sensible guy disgusted by the ruling class who tries to insult it by showing how bad it’s leading figures are. He’s surprised no one gets it but at least he makes a lot of money until that happens. https://t.co/ii9pGTz3R0

— P.C. Outsider (@PhilOutsider) November 23, 2022

PERFECT—ANDREW ROSS SORKIN IS MORE FULL OF SHIT THAN SAM IS. https://t.co/Y5PsRaRgVu

— INVESTMENT HULK (@INVESTMENTSHULK) November 23, 2022

“So, what’s your favorite color lol”

— litquidity (@litcapital) November 23, 2022

"This can't get any worse!"

Universe: "LOL, watch me!"

— Helin ULKER (@beautyofhelin) November 23, 2022

Hey @andrewrsorkin, can you also please invite AG Merrick Garland to the summit: we'd love to see him shake hands with SBF https://t.co/twLcOLQUtP

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) November 23, 2022

When SBF flies safely back to the Bahamas after attending the @dealbook summit pic.twitter.com/qgYCyQMlUA

— Ramp Capital (@RampCapitalLLC) November 23, 2022

Is this really still happening @nytimes?

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 24, 2022

In 2008, Bernie Madoff was arrested within 24 hours of his fraud being revealed.

In 2022, Sam Bankman-Fried will be attending the NYTimes dealbook summit after his fraud was revealed.

— Fintwit (@fintwit_news) November 23, 2022

This post was originally published at Zero Hedge

The Arizona attorney general’s office has launched an investigation into irregularities in Maricopa County’s handling of the midterm elections.

AG Mark Brnovich’s election integrity unit has demanded a full report of well-publicized irregularities, and what he claims is evidence of “statutory violations.”

The letter, sent late Saturday by Assistant AG Jennifer Wright to the county’s top civil division attorney, Thomas Liddy, is a major escalation over widespread problems with voting tabulators and printers, which delayed the declaration of a winner in razor-thin races in the attorney general’s race and the gubernatorial race.

Gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake has questioned the media’s premature declaration that her opponent, Democrat Katie Hobbs – who wasn’t exactly popular, won.

The letter demands a full report on how voting machine and printer issues were handled, along with a copy of each polling location’s Official Ballot Report, as well as explanations for any discrepancies.

Wright also demanded that the evidence be turned over before the final vote certification which is due Nov. 28.

“These complaints go beyond pure speculation, but include first-hand witness accounts that raise concerns regarding Maricopa’s lawful compliance with Arizona election law,” reads the letter. “Furthermore, statements made by both Chairman Gates and Recorder Richer, along with information Maricopa County released through official modes of communication appear to confirm potential statutory violations of title 16.”

Among the potential legal violations are poll workers giving improper instructions to voters whose ballot tabulations were delayed by the issues.

“Maricopa County appears to have failed to adhere to the statutory guidelines in segregating, counting, tabulating, tallying, and transporting the ‘Door 3’ ballots,” wrote Wright. “In fact, Maricopa County has admitted that in some voting locations, ‘Door 3’ non-tabulated ballots were commingled with tabulated ballots at the voting location.

“Further, we have received a sworn complaint from an election observer indicating that more than 1700 “Door 3” non-tabulated ballots from one voting location were placed in black duffle bags that were intended to be used for tabulated ballots.”

This post originally appeared at Zero Hedge