Connect with us

Climate Change

Video: Mindless Idiots Allowed To Vandalise Yet Another Priceless Painting

More cry baby plum munching larpers in action

Published

on

Screenshot

Another pair of posh trust fund babies were allowed to damage a priceless historical painting Tuesday, prompting calls for a stop to the coddling of such ‘environmental activists’.

As the Daily Mail reports, two members of a group that calls itself ‘Last Generation’ were allowed to throw a black, oily liquid over Gustav Klimt’s 1915 painting ‘Death and Life’, with one then gluing his hand to the damaged masterpiece at Vienna’s Leopold Museum

As a security guard restrained one of the idiots, he began to yell about the world being in “climate hell,” due to “fossil fuel destruction,” further blathering “we have known about the problem for 50 years ,we must finally act, otherwise the planet will be broken.”

Fortunately the painting was protected by a glass barrier, and experts are determining if any lasting damage has been done.

Reacting to the latest stunt, Austria’s culture minister Andrea Mayer declared that “art and culture are allies in the fight against climate catastrophe, not adversaries.”

“From my point of view, accepting the risk of irrevocable damage to works of art is the wrong way to go,” Mayer added. 

Hans-Peter Wipplinger, the director of the Leopold Museum, added that “attacking works of art is definitely the wrong way to implement the targeted goal of preventing the predicted climate collapse,” but also claimed that the concerns of the climate activists were justified.

The stunt follows other similar incidents orchestrated by the British group Just Stop Oil, who threw tomato soup at Vincent van Gogh’s ‘Sunflowers’ in London’s National Gallery last month, as well as gluing themselves to the frame of an early copy of Leonardo da Vinci’s ‘The Last Supper’ at London’s Royal Academy of Arts, and to John Constable’s ‘The Hay Wain’ in the National Gallery.

Another set of morons also threw pea soup onto a Vincent van Gogh masterpiece in Rome, vowing to continue until something is done about climate change.

A couple of cry babies just out of high chairs threw their mashed potato at a Monet in Germany:

A further set of spoiled brats glued themselves to a famous Goya work in Madrid while scrawling nonsense on the museum walls:

Should these two clowns be taken seriously?

More posh over-privileged bored students in action:

These two probably should be old enough to know better:

These two grandmas in Melbourne claimed to be with Extinction Rebellion:

This trend appears to have started back in May when a lone moron tried to smear the Mono Lisa with cream.

They are not restricting themselves to paintings:

As the attacks on artworks continue, dozens of the world’s top museums issued a joint declaration last week saying that the vandals “severely underestimate” the damage that could be caused to the artworks.

The full statement reads:

“In recent weeks, there have been several attacks on works of art in international museum collections. The activists responsible for them severely underestimate the fragility of these irreplaceable objects, which must be preserved as part of our world cultural heritage. As museum directors entrusted with the care of these works, we have been deeply shaken by their risky endangerment. 

Museums are places where people from a wide variety of backgrounds can engage in dialogue and which therefore enable social discourse. In this sense, the core tasks of the museum as an institution – collecting, researching, sharing and preserving – are now more relevant than ever. We will continue to advocate for direct access to our cultural heritage. And we will maintain the museum as a free space for social communication.”

The declaration was issued by the Prado museum in Madrid, and signed by the directors of more than 90 world-renowned museums including the Guggenheim in New York, Louvre in Paris and Uffizi in Florence.

The culprits believe that attention-seeking to propagandize for climate change activism, a cause amplified by virtually every major media outlet, corporation, the entertainment industry, cultural institution, government and academia, is some kind of rebellious, edgy statement.

It isn’t.

As we previously highlighted, it’s mostly just a desperate attempt to get noticed by unloved children who have nothing else to complain about.

Western governments are pursuing net zero carbon policies with fervour, raising the question, what exactly are these plum cheeked freaks crying for?

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter:

———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/ PJW Shop

ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

  • Climate Change

    Happy Now?

    Well done, morons.

    Published

    on

    Thanks to eco-lobbyists, government councils across the UK are cutting down thousands of trees to make way for new bus routes and cycle lanes.

    Congratulations, idiots.

    Please share this video! https://youtu.be/PkCXpjNgR1A

    SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

    Follow on Twitter:

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

    PJW Shop

    ALERT!

    In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

    I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

    Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

    Get early access, exclusive content and behind the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Video: Kamala Harris Worries About “Climate Mental Health”

    Complains that young people are worried about having to get a real job when they should be concentrating on being climate activists

    Published

    on

    Steve Watson

    Screenshot

    During a climate change event in Florida Kamala Harris explained how she is worried about young Americans suffering “climate mental health” problems, specifically that they have to get jobs when they should be spending their time being climate change activists.

    “One of the young leaders was talking to me about climate mental health,” Harris stated while speaking at the “Aspen Ideas: Climate Conference” in Miami Beach, adding “I said ‘Tell me what’s going on with your peers.’”

    She continued, “I said ‘I think I understand that, but unpack it for me. She talked about how her peers are thinking about it, and one example is whether when they’re ready, could they start a family. Worried about what that would mean. And the stress of it.”

    Harris added “They were talking about it in terms of their peers trying to figure out if they’re gonna have to get a job and whether they’re gonna have to make a living, but what can they do and how can they adapt their education that they’re having now to their activism?”

    Watch:

    However will they cope with having to do an actual job rather than throwing soup on paintings or glueing themselves to the road?

    In a sense, Harris is correct. There definitely is a mental health problem surrounding climate change. A constant barrage of doom and fanaticism propelled by governments and amplified by the corporate media and throughout culture has created a new generation of pathological, privileged narcissists.

    SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

    Follow on Twitter:

    ———————————————————————————————————————
    Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/ PJW Shop

    ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

    We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

    Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

    Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

  • Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Porsche, Ferrari’s Plan To Save Combustion Engines Involves “eFuels”

    Published

    on

    Zero Hedge

    Getty Images / Johannes Schmoelz / EyeEm

    With many automakers transitioning from petrol-powered vehicles to electrified ones, Porsche and Ferrari are pursuing a new strategy by concentrating on the advancement of eFuels to preserve gas-powered engines. This decision follows the European Commission’s delay last week of the proposed 2035 ban on new internal combustion engine vehicles as the commission prepares to carve out a role for eFuels after 2035.

    “Porsche and Ferrari’s status as national icons was enough to move their governments to challenge the EU plan last week just days before a scheduled vote,” Bloomberg wrote. 

    Germany’s Transport Minister Volker Wissing told the European Commission that he would withhold support for the approval of the new engine standards to end the sale of new combustion engine cars unless there were a plan for eFuels post-2035. Italy also threatened to fight the reforms.

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Sunday, discussing a comprise that would likely involve eFuels. 

    Germany and Italy are home to the world’s top sportscar manufacturers. There has been growing opposition against Brussels’ plan to ban petrol-powered engines. That’s because who in their right mind would purchase an all-electric Porsche 911? 

    The alternative route, mainly for sportscar brands, is the development of eFuels as a climate-neutral way to preserve combustion engines—just something about the sound of a twin-turbo V-8 or V-6 that captivates motorheads.

    While most carmakers are pouring tens of billions into the EV shift, Porsche has also invested in an e-fuel plant in Chile, partly because the manufacturer doesn’t plan to make its 911 sports car with a plug. Operating combustion-engine vehicles in a climate-neutral way could also help speed up the decarbonization of the transport sector, according to a Porsche spokesman. Existing vehicle stock should be included in the push to lower CO2 emissions faster, he added. Ferrari has said it’s pursuing alternative fuels to keep making combustion-engine cars that preserve its heritage.

    Proponents of e-fuels, say they’re essentially renewable electricity that’s been converted into a combustible, liquid fuel. To make it, scientists combine captured carbon dioxide with hydrogen that was split from water in a process powered by renewable energy, creating a synthetic hydrocarbon fuel. When burned in a combustion engine, the e-fuels create carbon dioxide. But since it was made from previously captured CO2, they argue it’s climate neutral.

    We’ve outlined the growing resistance among vehicle brands and motorsport organizations that are firm in their belief the combustion engine will be sticking around for years to come. 

    It’s straightforward, the push for eFuels for sportscars will likely preserve the combustion engine, but the cost per gallon might make the cost to operate the vehicle so expensive that only the rich will only be able to afford it. 

    This post was originally published at Zero Hedge

    Continue Reading

    Trending