The same police force in the UK that defended a convicted pedophile against “hateful” Twitter comments also enforces ‘gender neutral’ warrant cards and claims stores labeling sanitary products “feminine care” is transphobic, it has been revealed.

Earlier this week, Sussex Police caused controversy by threatening people who had the temerity to ‘misgender’ Sally Ann Dixon, a transgender who was a man when he sexually abused seven children.

“Sussex Police do not tolerate any hateful comments towards their gender identity regardless of crimes committed,” the police force tweeted in response to comments asking if the pedophile would be sent to a women’s prison or if the crime was recorded as having been committed by a woman.

The police force later had to apologize for the tweet after they were admonished by Home Secretary Suella Braverman to, “Focus on catching criminals not policing pronouns.”

It has now been revealed that the same police force eliminated the use of warrant cards used to determine the gender of their own officers.

“Sussex Police scrapped warrant cards that identified male officers with the letters A or C and female officers with B or D in November last year. The move prompted complaints that it would make it harder to find a female officer to carry out duties only a woman could do – such as searching a female suspect,” reports the Telegraph.

The same police force also faced ridicule in 2017 when one of their sergeants took to Twitter to warn high street stores that putting “feminine care” signs on women’s sanitary products was transphobic and breached gender equality rules.

Following the backlash over defending the convicted pedophile, Katy Bourne, the Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner, contacted Jo Shiner, Sussex’s chief constable, to tell her that police “had somewhat lost the plot” in expressing views “that appeared to ignore or demean the experiences of the victims in this case.”

“Police… must balance their communications so that they don’t appear to be prioritising the hurt feelings of criminals over the trauma and heartache of victims and their families,” wrote Bourne.

As we highlight in the video below, while police are keen on defending convicted child molesters against mean tweets, they’re not so pleasant towards ordinary citizens who use naughty words.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

———————————————————————————————————————

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

ALERT!

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Get early access, exclusive content and behind the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.

———————————————————————————————————————

A police department in the UK has come under fire after it appeared to defend a convicted pedophile, asserting that anyone ‘misgendering’ the individual would not be tolerated.

Sussex Police responded to posts from women’s rights campaigners who expressed concerns that the 58-year-old transgender pedophile, going by the name of Sally Ann Dixon, could be incarcerated in a women’s prison.

The individual, a biological male previously known as John Stephen Dixon until 2004, was sentenced to prison after being found guilty of 30 indecent assaults against children dating from 1989 to 1996. 

Rebel News reporter Ian Miles Cheong noted that police issued a thinly veiled threat to investigate anyone misgendering the child rapist for potential ‘hate crimes’.

Sussex Police are standing in defense of a male child rapist (whom they incorrectly identify as a "female" child rapist because the rapist identifies as a "female") and now they're lashing out at the public and threatening to arrest anyone who misgenders the child rapist. pic.twitter.com/oLjnSupkMT

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 27, 2022

The department tweeted “Hi, Sussex Police do not tolerate any hateful comments towards their gender identiy regardless of crimes committed. This is irrelevant to the crime that has been committed and investigated.”

The response was swift and devastating, prompting the police department to delete their posts:

@SussexPCC can you or the police force please clarify if this has been recorded as a 'female' crime on your stats?

— Clare King (@ClareFKing) September 27, 2022

I think they are now legally required to record the crime as committed by a male. What did you do Sussex Police? Receipts please.

— Aisling Roberts 💙 (@AislingRoberts) September 27, 2022

Sussex Police, I am exercising my gender critical views, which are protected in law. Can you advise whether making such statements is a crime?

— Sybil 💜🤍💚 🟥 🇬🇧 🐐 Untoward about paedophiles (@Weatherwax6655) September 27, 2022

Hi @sussex_police can you tell us if this crime was counted as being committed by a man or a woman? He was male when he committed the offences. Men commit an overwhelming majority of sex/violent crimes and just a few male crimes allocated to women would skew the figures (1/2)

— Frances Crook (@francescrook) September 27, 2022

The sex of the perpetrator certainly is not irrelevant in crimes of sexual violence against children, for example rates of perpetration differ hugely by sex.
Moreover, if crimes committed by males are recorded as crimes by females then policy based on crime data will be hopeless.

— Karen Ingala Smith (@K_IngalaSmith) September 27, 2022

Seems that @sussex_police have familiarized themselves with the delete button. pic.twitter.com/aLSsP4wfpo

— Leavethis Here 💛🤍💜🏳️‍🌈🇺🇸🦕♀️ (@leavethis_here) September 27, 2022

.@Sussex_police have done well to put a dangerous criminal behind bars. But they’ve got it wrong by playing identity politics and denying biology. Focus on catching criminals not policing pronouns. #commonsensepolicing https://t.co/19U1Qf77F7

— Suella Braverman MP (@SuellaBraverman) September 27, 2022

The department then issued a follow up APOLOGISING and stating “we recognise the rights of the public to express themselves freely”:

Please see our statement below in relation to the recent sentencing of a historic sex offender. pic.twitter.com/7ZcwkT7yEt

— Sussex Police (@sussex_police) September 27, 2022

Too late:

Has the officer behind the tweet been disciplined for breaching the Standards of Professional Behaviour?

— Russian warship, go f*** yourself (@JonezinWidJonez) September 27, 2022

Talk about grudging.
You should at the very least have initiated disciplinary proceedings against the author of your tweets.

— Tony K (@TeeKAye10) September 27, 2022

It's a pity the police representative went for Stonewall points and threats rather than engaging with the public.

— Sulli_A (@sullivam1968) September 27, 2022

I’m offended too. I think that makes it a hate crime right?

— Christopher Nihilism McNuggets (@ChristopherNih1) September 27, 2022

Also you say you recognise our rights to speak freely, yet you tried to bully woman into silence. Why?

— Howard Stevenson (@How_Stevenson) September 27, 2022

You offended many people – you have no choice but to arrest yourselves.

— Eva Kurilova (@eva_kurilova) September 27, 2022

I think this needs more than an apology. It's very very concerning that there are potentially police officers who could be behind those tweets on the street putting their feelings before the law.

— BYJ – Слава Україні! Героям слава! (@chris_grey___) September 27, 2022

Women’s rights campaigner Maya Forstater has called for a review “up and down the justice system from the police to CPS to courts and prison system to record and speak truthfully about sex.”

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) has deleted the website of their Transgender Clinic after journalist Matt Walsh detailed a doctor’s promotion of transgender surgeries as a “big money maker” for the institution.

Videos obtained by Walsh also show apparent threats made against VUMC medical professionals who objected to the procedures, even for religious reasons.

Walsh posted his findings in a lengthy Twitter thread on Tuesday. In it, Dr. Shayne Taylor can be seen bragging about how she convinced Nashville to get into gender transitions because it’s a “big money maker,” especially because the surgeries require a lot of “follow ups.”

Vanderbilt opened its trans clinic in 2018. During a lecture the same year, Dr. Shayne Taylor explained how she convinced Nashville to get into the gender transition game. She emphasized that it's a "big money maker," especially because the surgeries require a lot of "follow ups" pic.twitter.com/zedM7HBCBe

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 20, 2022

According to Dr. Ellen Clayton, those with “conscientious objections” are “problematic,” and anyone who opposes the transgender surgery program will face “consequences.” 

“If you are going to assert conscientious objection, you have to realize that that is problematic,” said Clayton. “You are doing something to another person, and you are not paying the cost for your belief. I think that is a … real issue.”

“I just want you to take home that saying that you’re not going to do something because of your conscientious — because of your religious beliefs, is not without consequences, and should not be without consequences,” she continues. “And I just want to put that out there.”

“We are given an enormous — if you don’t want to do this kind of work, don’t work at Vanderbilt.“

In case the objectors hadn't gotten the memo, Vanderbilt unveiled a program called "Trans Buddies." The "buddies" are trans activists from the community who attend appointments with trans patients, monitoring the doctors to guard against "unsafe" behavior such as misgendering pic.twitter.com/KyYUdRHrrP

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 20, 2022

Marketing to children

UVMC also makes “Trans Buddies” and other services available to children, “including chemical castration,” writes Walsh – who added that they altered their website within the last month, yet forgot to delete a video from Vanderbilt Psychiatry’s YouTube channel from 2020 which admits they will give hormones to children as young as 13.

But they must have forgot to delete a video from Vanderbilt Psychiatry’s Youtube channel back in 2020 which admits explicitly that they will give and have given irreversible hormone drugs to children as young as 13. pic.twitter.com/Qn48zWoJ1N

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 20, 2022

The university will also perform double mastectomies on adolescent girls.

So, let’s review. Vanderbilt got into the gender transition game admittedly in large part because it is very financially profitable. They then threatened any staff members who objected, and enlisted a gang of trans activists to act as surveillance in order to force compliance.

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 20, 2022

They now castrate, sterilize, and mutilate minors as well as adults, while apparently taking steps to hide this activity from the public view.

This is what "health care" has become in modern America.

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 20, 2022

In response to Walsh’s reporting, Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee (R) called for an investigation into VUMC.

“The ‘pediatric transgender clinic’ at Vanderbilt University Medical Center raises serious moral, ethical and legal concerns,” Lee told the Daily Wire. “We should not allow permanent, life-altering decisions that hurt children or policies that suppress religious liberties, all for the purpose of financial gain. We have to protect Tennessee children, and this warrants a thorough investigation.”

Meanwhile, Vanderbilt nuked their entire Transgender Clinic website.

Don’t worry, we knew this would happen and have spent the past week saving videos and screenshots. We have it all. They can’t hide it now.

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 21, 2022

This post was originally published at Zero Hedge