U.S. News
Report: Democrats Want To Introduce Law That Would Allow Police To Confiscate Guns From US Troops
Any military service members accused of ‘domestic violence’ could be stripped of their 2nd Amendment rights
A report out of Military.com notes that House Democrats are aiming to pass legislation that would allow police to confiscate firearms from active duty troops.
The report notes that the legislation would permit civilian police to take the action against any military service members if they are accused of ‘domestic violence.’
California Democratic Rep. Jackie Speier, who chairs the House Armed Services Committee’s subcommittee dedicated to personnel said “Domestic violence is a forgotten crisis in the military, and that’s why I offered an NDAA [National Defense Authorization Act] amendment to ensure that service members have access to military court protective orders that are as strong and enforceable as protective orders issued by civilian courts.”
The report explains that the law as it currently stands means that civilian law enforcement does not enforce military court orders, and commanders have no authority to seize guns from troops if they are kept off base.
The Democrat legislation would “create a system for military courts to issue protective orders,” the report notes, adding that “Military court protective orders would be fully recognized by state and local law enforcement under the proposed law.”
Critics of the proposal point out that it is similar to so called ‘red flag’ gun confiscation laws that allow police or family members to petition a court to remove firearms from anyone deemed to be a danger to themselves or others.
Republicans are opposing the move, calling on the leaders of the House and Senate armed services committees to remove the provision from the NDAA, arguing that it “would violate the Second Amendment rights of our nation’s brave service members by allowing military judges and magistrates to issue military court gun confiscation orders.”
Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas further urged that “Congress should not allow servicemen who are faced with allegations to have their firearms taken away first, and face due process later.”
Last year an almost identical provision in the House version of the NDAA was removed as it progressed to the Senate, which at the time was controlled by Republicans.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.
Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, we urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————
U.S. News
Video: Sam Harris Claims It Was An “Accident” That NY Post Was Right About Hunter Biden Laptop
He previously admitted he ‘wouldn’t have cared if Hunter Biden had corpses of children in his basement’
Lefty ‘philosopher’ Sam Harris, who previously admitted he supported the suppression of reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop immediately prior to the election, has now claimed that the New York Post’s reporting on the story was accurate only “by accident.”
Speaking with Bill Maher on his podcast, Harris declared that the reaction to him saying he wouldn’t have cared if Hunter Biden had corpses of children in his basement was “right wing lunacy,” and that it “kind of distorted my position.”
Harris further declared that “the velocity of the hatred was something new,” and claimed that “it was completely plausible to worry that this was a fake story… there simply wasn’t enough time to get to the bottom of it.”
Maher challenged him on the suppression of the laptop story, noting “Well then why did the outlets that did get to the bottom of it, get to it? The New York Post had no problem getting to the bottom of it.”
Harris replied, “They wanted to believe it and yes, you know, sometimes you’re right by accident.”
Maher responded, “Can I go to step two of what the two reasonable people in the room would agree on. One, they’d agree it was kind of suppressed. Two, they’d agree that Hunter Biden, being the son of the current Vice President, and being a complete douchebag, was ripe to be used as a conduit to his father, through which he was, but nothing really. It was kind of sort of everyday graft, that’s sleazy, but doesn’t affect the world.”
“It’s possible we still don’t know, right,” Harris replied, adding “I’ll give some credence to the possibility that it’s worse than I understand. But the problem is ten days is not enough to figure that out and we knew that it was going to rail the issue.”
Harris then attempted to steer the conversation to Trump and his administration being more corrupt than Biden.
Watch:
The New York Post story on the Hunter Biden laptop was censored on Twitter and other platforms and labelled ‘Russian disinformation‘ in a chilling example of election meddling fewer than 3 weeks before the vote that saw Biden take the White House.
It has since been proven that the story is completely accurate, with journalists such as Glenn Greenwald describing the cover up as “the single biggest media fraud” in the past decade.
Harris put himself in the spotlight again this week by criticising Elon Musk’s attempts to restore free speech on Twitter:
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.
Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, we urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————
As we discussed last night, Sam Bankman-Fried has now demonstrated that he is both a pathological liar and a sociopath, the kind who in “explaining” to his employees how he stole billions (over $4 billion according to new FTX CEO John J. Ray) from the now bankrupt FTX, an act which left it insolvent and without liquidity, called it “loans” which were “generally” not used for “large amounts of personal consumption” (just “small amounts” used for such trivial items as $40 million penthouses and private jets).
And the only reason we don’t officially call him a criminal just yet, is because he has not yet confirmed he used client money from his exchange to fund his personal hedge fund, an act which would cost any other individual decades in jail… but not prominent democrats like SBF or Jon Corzine, of course. Plus it’s the US legal system’s job to do that, not ours. Although we are growing increasingly skeptical this prominent Democratic donor will ever see the inside of a courtroom.
It’s not just us: with much of the entire world demanding to know how this corpulent 30-year-old still has not been thrown in prison, or at least charged with a variety of crimes, the NYT just confirmed to the entire world what a farce the one-time paper of record has become, and how it is willing to whore itself out for clicks – not to mention prominent Democrat donors – because moments after SBF tweeted that he will be speaking with Andrew Ross-Sorkin moderated NYT “summit” on Nov 30…
… Sorkin quickly confirmed as much.
And so, instead of being under arrest, SBF will instead be treated like a luminary alongside other such other Democrat icons as Zelenskyy (who according to some may have been intimately familiar with FTX fund flows in the past year) and of course the woman who along with Ben Bernanke and Jerome Powell, made it all possible by blowing the biggest asset bubble of all time: Janet Yellen.
And while we are certain that the NYT – which we assume is done writing puff pieces on behalf of SBF after it became a laughing stock last week – would be quick to mercilessly cancel and expel from its “prestigious” conference anyone who had misgendered some post-op transsexual, it is willing to give this thieving pathological liar and sociopath a forum in which to profess his innocence to the entire world, and by association with other Democrat “celebrities” such as Bill Clinton.
… to boost his standing within a legal system that is clearly as much as joke as the venue that he will be sharing with the following individuals:
Here are all the other “top business and policy leaders” at the NYT whitewashing summit:
- Eric Adams, New York City mayor
- Ben Affleck, Artists Equity C.E.O.
- Sam Bankman-Fried, FTX founder
- Gerry Cardinale, RedBird Capital Partners founder, managing partner and C.I.O.
- Shou Chew, TikTok C.E.O.
- Larry Fink, BlackRock chairman and C.E.O.
- Reed Hastings, Netflix founder and co-C.E.O.
- Andy Jassy, Amazon president and C.E.O.
- Van Jones, CNN host, author and Dream.Org founder
- Scarlett Lewis, Jesse Lewis Choose Love Movement founder and mother of Sandy Hook shooting victim, Jesse
- Mike Pence, 48th vice president of the United States and author of “So Help Me God”
- Benjamin Netanyahu, former Prime Minister of Israel, current leader of the Likud party
- Priscilla Sims Brown, Amalgamated Bank president and C.E.O.
- Secretary Janet L. Yellen, U.S. Department of the Treasury
- President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine
- Mark Zuckerberg, Meta founder, chairman and C.E.O.
The shocked, stunned and simply disgusted reactions are still coming in:
U.S. News
MSNBC’s Resident Fed: Tucker Carlson Should Face “Civil Consequences” If Mass Shooters Watch His Show
“We need to see accountability and consequences,” but only when it fits the narrative
MSNBC talking head Frank Figliuzzi proclaimed Tuesday that conservative figures like Tucker Carlson and GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert should be subject to “civil consequences” if mass shooters are found to have “consumed” their content.
Ranting about the shooting in a gay club in Colorado Springs this past weekend, Figliuzzi, a former FBI agent with clout, stated that “If [the Colorado Springs shooter] is a consumer of the people we just rattled off, from Lauren Boebert to Tucker Carlson, let’s get it out at trial, let’s expose it for what it is, name it and shame it.”
“He’s a consumer of these people and those people should face civil consequences from the victims,” asserted Figliuzzi, a rabid anti-Trump hack and now MSNBC’s “national security analyst”.
“We need to see accountability and consequences,” Figliuzzi further declared.
Watch:
The latest reports suggest that the shooter isn’t some anti-LGBT right wing nut job, but rather identifies as “nonbinary” and uses “they/them pronouns,” according to the New York Times.
Right, so who should face “civil consequences” for voicing their opinions now then?
What about when a mass killer falls outside such simplistic propaganda narratives? Any civil consequences needed for anyone then?
Nah, doesn’t appear so.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.
Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, we urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————
-
Coronavirus5 days agoAnti-Lockdown Stanford Professor: “Academic Freedom Is Dead”
-
Bizarre6 days agoBalenciaga Apologizes For Vile Kiddie Bondage Ad Featuring Child Porn Prop
-
Coronavirus6 days agoVideo: Biden COVID Minion Tells Americans “God Gave Us Two Arms” For Multiple Vaccines
-
Bizarre14 hours agoWashington Post Tells Americans To EAT BUGS As They Can No Longer Afford Traditional Seasonal Dinners
-
Health6 days agoVideo: Dr. Atlas Sums Up Fauci’s Legacy Of “Massive Harm”
-
clownworld4 days agoSwiss Captain Rejects World Cup Virtue Signaling
-
Bizarre3 days agoFlashback: Kanye Warned About ‘Protecting Kids’ From Subliminal Messages in Media
-
Black Lives Matter3 days agoWATCH: England Football Team Kneels at World Cup While U.S. Team Remains Standing