Connect with us

U.S. News

Mother Claims Biden, Garland Sent Feds To School Board Meeting After She Complained About Pedo Porn On Curriculum

“I have threats against my children by name, I have been followed in my car with my children, they have my vehicle, they know where I live”

Published

1 year ago

on

Screenshot

A mother of six in Virginia has claimed that parents at a school board meeting were surveilled by police and federal agents after she and others complained that their kids were being exposed to pornography and pedophilia on the school’s curriculum.

Stacy Langton posted images on Twitter showing unmarked cars along with a Department Of Homeland Security Vehicle and police cruisers. She also claimed that a helicopter was circling overhead shining a spotlight on parents before and after the board meeting.

Ms Langton appeared on Fox & Friends Wednesday to discuss the development, noting that the feds showed up a day after her and other parents protested outside the Department of Justice in DC.

“I have threats against my children by name, I have been followed in my car with my children, they have my vehicle, they know where I live, and I don’t know who’s putting somebody up to this, but it’s obviously meant to intimidate me,” said Langton.  

She added “I’m not getting a lot of sleep right now, nobody’s sleeping in my house because we can’t be sure that we’re safe.”

Watch:

A video of Langton defiantly speaking out against the porn books as school officials tried to shut her down went viral last month:

In her interview Wednesday, Langton also noted “I understand Merrick Garland is actually testifying today at the Senate and he’s gonna talk about mobilizing the FBI against parents.”

“Maybe he should mobilize the FBI into who’s threatening my family,” she urged.

During that hearing, Senator Tom Cotton grilled Garland, demanding an explanation for the recent DOJ directive calling for the full force of the federal government to be deployed against American parents who are showing up to local school board meetings to express their concerns.

The DOJ issued a memo on the subject after the National School Boards Association (NSBA) equated the angry parents to “domestic terrorists,”which it later apologized for.

Other GOP representatives also eviscerated Garland.

Ted Cruz (R-TX) grilled Garland on a range of issues, including his lack of apology over the DOJ memo:

Cruz also highlighted a direct conflict of interest Garland has as regards to the teaching of critical race theory in schools:

Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) also told the Attorney General, “You have weaponized the FBI and the Department of Justice, and I call on you to resign!”

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) accused AG Garland of engaging in communist tactics that put a chilling effect on parents wishing to speak out.

“That is a poisonous, chilling effect,” Grassley said. “This kind of looks like something that would come out of a communist country.”

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Comments

U.S. News

Video: Rand Paul Explains To Josh Hawley Why His Tik Tok Ban Bill Is Unconstitutional

“I will defend the Bill of Rights against all comers, even if, need be, from members of my own party”

Published

18 hours ago

on

30 March, 2023

Steve Watson

Screenshots

Republican Senators clashed on floor Wednesday over a bill proposing a ban on the Chinese social media app Tik Tok, with Rand Paul schooling Josh Hawley on exactly why the legislation won’t fly.

Hawley’s legislation would prohibit TikTok from operating in the U.S. and ban all commercial activity with TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance.

The topic has become one of contention, being connected with enhanced efforts on China’s part to carry out surveillance.

Paul immediately expressed opposition, however, noting “There are two main reasons why we might not want to do this. The one would be the First Amendment to the Constitution. Speech is protected whether you like it or not. The second reason would be that the Constitution actually prohibits bills of attainder.”

Bills of attainder allow the government to punish individuals or groups without a trial.  

“This fails on two egregious points, pretty obvious points. I think we ought to think about that,” Paul added.  

Paul further stated “I think we should be aware of those who peddle fear. I think we should be aware of those who use fear to coax Americans to relinquish our liberties.”

“Every accusation of data-gathering that’s been attributed to TikTok could also be attributed to domestic Big Tech companies,” he pointed out.  

Hawley responded to Paul, asserting “I have never before heard on this floor a defense of the right to spy.” 

“I didn’t realize that the First Amendment contained a right to espionage. The senator from Kentucky mentions the Bill of Rights. I must have missed the right of the Chinese government to spy on Americans in our Bill of Rights,” Hawley added, ignoring Paul’s wider point.

“In a free country, I don’t have the right to tell The New York Times to publish by op-ed or YouTube to publish my speech,” Paul hit back, adding that Americans can easily quit using Tik Tok.

“But don’t disenfranchise 150 million Americans who are using a social media app and just say it’s no big deal,” Paul said.

He later asked “Which is more dangerous: Videos of teenagers dancing or the precedent of the U.S. government banning speech?”

“For me it’s an easy answer. I will defend the Bill of Rights against all comers, even if, need be, from members of my own party,” Paul emphasised.

The full exchange is below:

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter:

———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/ PJW Shop

ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

    • Continue Reading

    U.S. News

    Cruz: Dems “Perfectly Willing To Turn A Blind Eye” To Child Rape And Murder At Border

    Because illegal immigrants are future Democrat voters

    Published

    19 hours ago

    on

    30 March, 2023

    Steve Watson

    Screenshot

    Appearing Hannity Wednesday, Senator Ted Cruz expanded on his comments earlier in the week to the head of the Department of Homeland Security, charging that Democrats are ignoring serious criminality at the border in the hope that illegal immigrants will become future voters.

    “They are allowing it because they made a political choice,” Cruz said, asserting that the plan only works with the complicity of the establishment media to also ignore the crisis.

    “At the beginning of the Biden administration, they decided unlimited illegal immigration, open borders, they view everyone of those 5.5 million illegal immigrants that have come in under Joe Biden as a future Democrat voter,” Cruz urged.

    He added, “And so they’re perfectly willing to turn a blind eye, they don’t care about the children that are physically assaulted, that are sexually assaulted.”

    “They don’t about the women who were raped. They don’t care about the dead bodies that are piling up,” the Senator proclaimed.

    Watch:

    On Tuesday, Cruz told DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas to his face “your refusal to do your job is revolting,” adding “you’re willing to let children be raped to follow political orders.”

    “This is a crisis, it’s disgrace, and you won’t even admit this human tragedy is a crisis,” Cruz continue, calling for Mayorkas to resign.

    Video: Ted Cruz Eviscerates DHS Secretary For STILL Refusing To Admit There Is Border Crisis

    SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

    Follow on Twitter:

    ———————————————————————————————————————
    Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/ PJW Shop

    ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

    We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

    Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

    Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

    • Continue Reading

    U.S. News

    Transgender Shooter’s Manifesto Will Be Released Publicly

    After the FBI has combed through it.

    Published

    20 hours ago

    on

    30 March, 2023

    BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI via Getty Images

    The transgender shooter’s manifesto will be released publicly, but only after the FBI has combed through it to build a psychological profile of the killer.

    28-year-old Audrey Hale was shot dead by police after killing three children and three adults at The Covenant School, a private Christian school for students aged three to 11.

    Authorities say Hale deliberately targeted the school after considering but then rejecting two other public school targets because they had better security.

    Police initially said Hale’s transgender identity was a factor in motivating her rampage, but it seemed the manifesto she left might remain secret after lobbying from LGBT groups.

    However, Nashville Council Member Robert Swope told the New York Post that the manifesto will be released publicly after all.

    “The manifesto is going to be released. It’s just a matter of when. There are some incredibly brilliant psychological minds and psychological analysts combing through her entire life,” said Swope.

    The FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit is working “in tandem with” the Metro Nashville Police Department (MNPD) to complete “a very in-depth analysis of certain aspects of the shooter’s life,” Swope added.

    Speculation has raged as to whether Tennessee’s ban on hormone treatments and puberty blockers for children, as well as its restrictions on drag queen shows, were motivating factors for Hale.

    As we highlighted yesterday, the media narrative has switched to there being “no known motive” behind the attack, an explanation presumably based on the expectation that the manifesto would remain hidden.

    This would conveniently absolve the press from having to scrutinize whether elements of the trans activist movement has become violently radicalized in recent years.

    However, a new narrative has emerged that Hale’s rampage was a backlash to her trans identity being rejected by her parents, another callous angle that borderline attempts to justify the attack.

    A Daily Mail report suggests Hale’s parents refused to respect her new ‘he/him’ pronouns and that the shooter would leave the home to change outfits.

    According to the report, Hale’s parents “just didn’t accept” her new lifestyle.

    Respondents to the story savaged the Daily Mail for appearing to place more blame on the parents than on Hale herself.

    “Ah yes, blame the Christians for the mass shooting. FFS can media like @DailyMail get anymore disgusting and deranged?” one Twitter user asked.

    “You’re not even trying to hide your anti-Christian bigotry,” responded another.

    SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

    Follow on Twitter:

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

    PJW Shop

    ALERT!

    In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

    I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

    Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

    Get early access, exclusive content and behind the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    Continue Reading

    Trending