A prominent theatre in Canada has received backlash for promoting a series of events that are billed for “black only” audiences.

Critics charged that The National Arts Center in Ottawa is operating a segregationist policy after it announced that some events would be run under a “Black Out,” meaning that only black people can attend.

“A Black Out is an open invitation to Black-identifying audiences to come and experience performances with their community,” the National Arts Center’s website states, adding “The evenings will provide a dedicated space for Black theatergoers to witness a show that reflects the vivid kaleidoscope that is the Black experience.”

Further productions at the theatre are scheduled to operate a black-only admission policy throughout the 2023-24 season. 

It's funny because the only demographic this play will appeal to is self-loathing white shitlibs.

— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) January 30, 2023

Journalist Jonathan Kay pointed out that the first upcoming event, a show called Is God Is was previously labelled as for ‘black identifying’ audiences, but was swiftly updated to a full black only event.

UPDATE: The @CanadasNAC has tightened up the admission requirements for its upcoming race-segregated performance. It's no longer "black-identifying." It's now "black," full stop. So don't even think about going if you're, say, Indigenous, Asian, white, etc. https://t.co/eSIKQrZHdf pic.twitter.com/i2fp1CJSmr

— Jonathan Kay (@jonkay) January 24, 2023

The theatre claims that the events will “allow for conversation and participation to be felt throughout the theatre,” and will give audiences the opportunity to “experience the energy of the NAC with a shared sense of belonging and passion.”

Apparently not if you’re White, Asian or anything other than black though.

Ironically, on the NAC website there is a notification stating “We would like to recognize the Algonquin Anishinabeg Nation, on whose traditional unceded territory the National Arts Centre is located. We gratefully acknowledge them as the past, present and future stewards of this land.“

Presumably they are also precluded from the black only events.

Responding to the criticism, Annabelle Cloutier, executive director of strategy and communications for the NAC claimed “There are no racially segregated shows at the NAC.”

Sure seems like there are.

“There will be no checkpoints for Black Out night ticket holders and no questions will be asked about anyone’s identity, race or gender,” Cloutier confusingly added.

Be fun to see what happens when we start having "white only" events.

— WDMoor (@wdmoor) January 24, 2023

Can a black person bring their white partner in to see this event?

— Jeff (@J_Niagara) January 24, 2023

I wonder if my husband & kids would want to go. I can't.

— Cathy Ramroop (@cathy_ramroop) January 24, 2023

Fight racism with more racism

— Joe (@joesarkees) January 24, 2023

Good thing I wasnt going anyway.

— NachoBeerHunter (@nachobeerhunter) January 24, 2023

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

Democratic Representative Sheila Jackson Lee suggested Monday that Tucker Carlson could be the first to be prosecuted under legislation she has introduced that would see any white person talking about ‘replacement theory’ be criminalized.

As previously noted, the legislation, known as The Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023, would categorise any speech that is found to have “inspired” a racially motivated crime as a ‘hate crime’.

The draconian law would effectively make an individual responsible for someone else’s crime if prosecutors were able to successfully argue that their political rhetoric was a motivating factor.

Dems Want Law That Would Characterize ‘Replacement Theory’ Discussion as a Hate Crime

The bill also targets speech that “vilifies or is otherwise directed against any non-white person or group” on social media.

If such content is “read, heard, or viewed by a person who engaged in the planning, development, preparation or perpetration of a white supremacy inspired hate crime,” even if misinterpreted, the creator of such content is guilty of conspiracy.

Appearing on perpetual race baiter Joy Reid’s show, Jackson Lee was asked “Does this bill allow potential prosecution of people like Tucker Carlson?”

“Because he is one of the people who promotes white supremacist ideology,” Reid further claimed.

“The bill has nothing to do with speech,” Lee asserted, adding “I was thinking about the pledge of allegiance and it says justice and equality for all. and I would offer to say that everyone deserves justice and equality.”

“It seems that the right wing extremists, the violent extremists, don’t want that to happen,” she further suggested.

“This does not criminalize speech,” she persisted, further claiming “It’s a crime bill, a criminal law bill, which means that intent would have to be proved that what generated out of that speech– or your intent was to provoke someone to violence and that a violent act did occur. [If] Mr. Carlson or anyone else chooses to speak in ugly terms, his speech is protected.”

Watch:

Lee also claimed that under the legislation, non-white people could also be prosecuted if they advocate for “white supremacy.”

“It also is not a guarantee that white supremacy is promoted only by people who happen to be Caucasian,” Lee said, further proclaiming that “It is a philosophy, it is a philosophy and a point of view of that [FBI] Director [Chris] Wray has spoken about now for almost three years — that white supremacy is the largest part of domestic terrorism and domestic terrorism is larger than our fears of years back of Al-Qaeda.”

While the bill faces certain failure and would never be ratified by the Supreme Court, it’s clear that the intent of the legislation is to target and silence people like Tucker Carlson, who has built a massive audience on the back of highlighting how crazy Democratic proposals such as this very one are.

Carlson castigated the legislation last week, noting that “This single bill would do more to criminalize speech … than any other piece of legislation that has been proposed in the entire history of this country.”

Tucker Carlson slams a bill proposed by Sheila Jackson Lee:

"This single bill would do more to criminalize speech … than any other piece of legislation that has been proposed in the entire history of this country." pic.twitter.com/5aR8Fbi4u1

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) January 18, 2023

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube: Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet ——————————————————————————————————————— Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/ ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here. Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Get early access, exclusive content and behind the scenes stuff by following me on Locals. ———————————————————————————————————————

The Washington Post has been forced to issue a correction to an op-ed that asked ‘Why doesn’t Argentina have more black players in their World Cup lineup?’ after Argentinian people pointed out that the country is overwhelmingly white and not obsessed with virtue signalling about race.

The piece claimed that it is a ‘myth’ that Argentina is a white nation, with the author Erika Denise Edwards, an associate professor at the University of Texas at El Paso, suggesting her rantings uncover a “history of Black erasure in Argentina.”

A history of Black erasure in Argentina!! Check out my article! https://t.co/cSyaYaETt8

— Erika Edwards (@Prof_Edwards) December 10, 2022

In the piece Edwards argues that in the 18th century, a third of Argentina’s population was black and that since then there has been an agenda to ‘whiten’ the country.

“They believed that to join the ranks of Germany, France and England, Argentina had to displace its black population — both physically and culturally,” she further asserts.

She also points to census figures from 2010, claiming they prove that “roughly one percent” of Argentina’s population of 46 million is black.

After people pointed out that this is just not true, The Washington Post issued a correction noting that the actual number was “far less than” one percent.

The Washington Post opinion piece complaining that there are no black players on Argentina’s team has been corrected after the fact, to note that “far less than 1%” of the Argentine population is black. https://t.co/G7B5BO8LJO pic.twitter.com/kSBhjTRoV9

— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) December 12, 2022

This piece is full of inconsistencies and misinterpretations, it is evident that the person who wrote it has no knowledge of Argentine culture and never lived in Argentina.

— Sara Stewart Brown (@Kiwita) December 10, 2022

You can't apply an American perspective to this, @washingtonpost. The obsession to put everything through a lens that fits your world view in deeply troubling. In your article, you demonstrate a complete lack of understanding of the Indigenous, and Hispanic history of Argentina https://t.co/YE3NjQz9cr

— Nico Slobinsky (@nicoslobinsky) December 10, 2022

Just came back to laugh at Washington Post….

Washington Post- Argentina is racist because they don’t have black players in their team.

Washington Post – Sorry we didn’t know there are no black people in Argentina.

This is a paper funded by Bezos, and this is their research

— Whyteknight (@whyteknight07) December 12, 2022

So fewer than 150,000 in a country of 46 million. And that's including women and all men who are not between the ages of about 18 and 35, which is the approximate age window for players of this caliber. https://t.co/oSppma35R9

— Noam Blum (@neontaster) December 12, 2022

You just gathered one sided data that would confirm your bias and your preconceived idea of Blacks in Argentina.

— Pedro Bartholomai (@hansenribera) December 13, 2022

These pieces are always written by people who know 0 about football but a lot about woke

Are @WashingtonPost suggesting there are good black Argentine players not being selected for the team due to racism? Who are they?

No footballing nation leaves great players out due to race https://t.co/EDJSFlbLiA

— Ben Harris-Quinney (@B_HQ) December 11, 2022

Others noted that real life isn’t a Disney movie where each character is a different race:

Because we are a country, not a Disney movie. https://t.co/k8Lps8PgW2

— La Libertad Avanza (@LLibertadAvanza) December 10, 2022

La estúpida nota del @washingtonpost sobre la falta de negros en la selección argentina me dejó asqueado. Estados Unidos vive obsesionado con las razas, Argentina no. Estados Unidos eligió mantenerlas separadas, Argentina las mezcló. Pero insisten en exportar sus neurosis.

— Gonzalo Garcés (@GonzaloGarces5) December 10, 2022

Translation: “The stupid note from [Washington Post] about the lack of blacks in the Argentine team left me disgusted. The United States is obsessed with race, Argentina is not. The United States chose to keep them separate, Argentina mixed them. But they insist on exporting their neuroses.”

You have studied so many years for this article? You clearly have to study more.

You judgde Latinos and Latin America countries without understanding geography and history and so much more.

Do not transfer your racist problems to US.

— Pilar (@piluogorman) December 13, 2022

Remarkably, Edwards has doubled down, stating that nothing she wrote is factually incorrect:

There is nothing that I stated that is factually incorrect.–EDE @FoxNewsDigital https://t.co/a95415w7wE

— Erika Edwards (@Prof_Edwards) December 14, 2022

My article provides a brief history of how Argentina went from roughly 1/3 of pop categorized as black to less than 1% today. It primarily debunks the various myths that have been used to explain black disappearance."-EDE @nypost https://t.co/k0UAvQ1de1

— Erika Edwards (@Prof_Edwards) December 13, 2022

Do something please, this can't be tolerated anymore! There HAS to be black players in EVERY SINGLE soccer team of the world. Save us oh, great expert of racial identities! https://t.co/47KSABZVNp pic.twitter.com/7k8IMxVsql

— Cripto Moneda (@criptomonedaz) December 13, 2022

The obsession with diversity and race in national sports is purely an American and British phenomenon. People in other countries are not concerned with obsessing about skin colour over skill and talent.

Thoughts on the BBC lamenting the English women’s football team having too many white players.

Yes, this actually happened.https://t.co/uxaRdX2RQr

— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) July 15, 2022

BBC Reporter Highlights ‘Problem’ of English Female Football Team Being White

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————