censorship
Parler Lawsuit Against Amazon Shot Down By Judge
“Parler has submitted no evidence that AWS and Twitter acted together intentionally — or even at all — in restraint of trade”
Published
1 month agoon
Steve Watson

A federal judge has rejected a request by Parler, the free speech Twitter alternative, to have its hosting restored by Amazon.
Paler’s entire website was hosted on Amazon servers (AWS) and was wiped from the internet amid claims of allowing incitement to violence in the wake of the Capitol breech on January 6th.
Supporters of President Trump and other advocates of free speech flocked to the platform as a protest against big-tech censorship.
A federal judge has sided with Amazon in its legal battle against Parler — ruling that Amazon Web Services has no obligation to host Parler after it violated its terms of service.https://t.co/X62Iu8mgft
— NPR (@NPR) January 21, 2021
“Parler has failed to do more than raise the specter of preferential treatment of Twitter by AWS,” wrote Rothstein, labelling Parler’s claims as “faint and factually inaccurate speculation.”
The judge further noted “The evidence it has submitted in support of the claim is both dwindlingly slight, and disputed by AWS. Importantly, Parler has submitted no evidence that AWS and Twitter acted together intentionally — or even at all — in restraint of trade… Indeed, Parler has failed to do more than raise the specter of preferential treatment of Twitter by AWS.”
Parler is claiming that Amazon is in breach of contract, and that Amazon removed services “motivated by political animus”, and as a way of benefitting Twitter, which is also set to be hosted by Amazon Web Services.
However, the judge said that “Parler has failed to allege basic facts that would support several elements of this claim.”
The judge continued “Most fatally, as discussed above, it has failed to raise more than the scantest speculation that AWS’s actions were taken for an improper purpose or by improper means … To the contrary, the evidence at this point suggests that AWS’s termination of the CSA was in response to Parler’s material breach.”
Parler is arguing that Twitter has failed to censor violent content, but has not been treated in the same way.
Amazon has stated that there is “no merit to these claims.”
Below is the full complaint by Parler that was rejected by the judge:
Parler had around 12 million users when it was removed, and is attempting a comeback.
Parler Chief Executive John Matze, who was forced into hiding for his own safety, posted a message on Paler.com asking “Hello world, is this thing on?”
“Now seems like the right time to remind you all – both lovers and haters – why we started this platform,” Matze further wrote, adding. “We believe privacy is paramount and free speech essential, especially on social media.”
“Our aim has always been to provide a nonpartisan public square where individuals can enjoy and exercise their rights to both. We will resolve any challenge before us and plan to welcome all of you back soon. We will not let civil discourse perish,” he further noted.
However, the site now appears to be offline again.
It appears that Parler is now being hosted by Epik, the company that also hosts Twitter alternative Gab and messageboard 8chan.
Epik has stated that it disagrees with big tech moves to purge the likes of Parler, noting “It is becoming increasingly easy to demonize anyone who has different beliefs with no recognition of the actual effects and impact this can have on society.”
The company’s statement immediately led to calls for it to be targeted for annihilation, along with other hosting companies that are refusing to go along with mass censorship on the internet.
Epik goes next
— Slick Jedi 🌊 (@SlickJedi) January 17, 2021
Why Play “Whack a Mole” with Parler? Make the Service Providers whose digital Routers and networks enable these platforms to operate. The self regulation now practiced by Social Media giants need to be applied by those who control the Internet Architecture.
— Terry Mooney (@momobc) January 17, 2021
Epik should be sued and held punitively liable for their part in sedition. Hit them financially if they are morally bankrupt
— $10 Founding Father (@WaitForIt1776) January 17, 2021
Epik, LLC
— MD SPEED 😷🌊 (@MD__SPEED) January 17, 2021
704 228th Ave NE
Sammamish, WA 98074
Tel:
(888) 894-9026
(425) 366-8810
Support
Email: [email protected]
Abuse Email: [email protected]https://t.co/NBWsQ6kuvh
The end point of the ongoing purge seems clear, a completely censored internet dominated and controlled by unregulated big tech elites, where only ‘acceptable’ opinions cans be accessed and shared.
You may like
-
Merkel: EU Leaders ‘Have All Agreed That We Need Vaccine Passports’
-
Poll: Democrat Voters’ Number One ‘Concern’ Is Trump Supporters
-
One Month Into Presidency Biden BOMBS Syria
-
Mr. Potato Head to Become “Gender Neutral” to Allow Kids to Create “Same-Sex Families”
-
Amnesty Strips Russian Dissident of “Prisoner of Conscience” Status After He Was Accused of Being Racist 15 Years Ago
-
California Bill Would Fine Retailers That Keep Boys and Girls’ Toys and Clothing in Separate Sections
censorship
Facebook Algorithm Accuses 81-Year-Old Grandmother of “Hate Speech” Over Knitted Pigs Comment
Threatens to ban her account.
Published
1 day agoon
24 February, 2021
Facebook’s algorithm flagged an 81-year-old grandmother’s comments about knitted pigs as an example of “hate speech” and threatened her with a permanent ban.
Yes, really.
After losing her husband last year, Rita Rich-Mulcahy, a retired teacher who lives in Australia, created the Facebook page to share with the world her love of knitting and raise money for The Smith Family charity, which helps disadvantaged children.
After posting a picture of her own knitted pigs, Rich-Mulcahy referred to them as “white pigs” and “high-viz pigs,” resulting in the threat to terminate her account over “hate speech.”
“It may seem a small thing to most people, but to someone who had never even had an overdue library book, being charged with using hate speech was frightening,” said Rich-Mulcahy.
Facebook issued a statement asserting that its automated system flagging the comments was a “mistake” that its AI “sometimes” makes.
The story once again illustrates how Facebook’s censorship algorithm, which gets stricter almost by the day as a result of relentless mainstream media hysteria, is completely broken.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————
censorship
Twitter Blocks Links to CPAC Website
Users told link is “unsafe.”
Published
2 days agoon
24 February, 2021
Twitter is blocking links to the Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) website, with users being told they are sharing an “unsafe” URL.
CPAC is an annual political conference attended by activists, journalists and elected officials from the United States.
The organization’s 2021 gathering will get underway tomorrow Orlando, Florida, with former President Donald Trump scheduled as the headline speaker.
However, Twitter users attempting to access CPAC’s website from the social media platform are now shown a warning that tells them clicking the link “may be unsafe.”
The warning message goes on to list four categories, which includes “violent or misleading content that could lead to real-world harm.”
Twitter is blocking links to CPAC's website, https://t.co/ov8zGwWc2y, That slope sure got slippery quick! pic.twitter.com/pBHp6ZGgQu
— Mark Dice (@MarkDice) February 24, 2021
Users are still able to get to the website, but they have to agree to continue at their own risk.
Back in October, Twitter caused controversy by blocking a New York Post story about Hunter Biden’s alleged attempts to influence his father, Joe Biden, to shut down a probe into Ukrainian energy company Burisma.
The company claimed the story violated their “hacked materials” policy but did an about-face after CEO Jack Dorsey admitted that blocking URLs without context was “wrong.”
However, even after admitting its error, Twitter then blocked a follow-up story about Hunter Biden’s alleged effort to get his father a cut of a deal involving Shanghai-based CEFC China Energy Co.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————
censorship
Democrats Demand To Know Why Cable Companies Don’t CENSOR Conservative Media
“Are you planning to continue carrying Fox News, OANN, and Newsmax on your platform both now and beyond the renewal date? If so, why?”
Published
3 days agoon
23 February, 2021Steve Watson

In a blatant attempt to pressure cable providers to censor conservative media, Democrats have penned a letter demanding to know what they intend to do about certain channels, including Fox and Newsmax, spreading ‘disinformation’.
The letter sent Monday by California Democrats Anna Eshoo and Jerry McNerney also asked satellite and digital TV providers “Are you planning to continue carrying Fox News, OANN, and Newsmax on your platform both now and beyond the renewal date? If so, why?”
Now these members of Congress want massive corporations like AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast to apply some newfound "moral or ethical principles… related to journalistic integrity" in determining what content they allow to be disseminated on their services. What a hoot! pic.twitter.com/s004glbIte
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) February 22, 2021
The letter, which claimed the networks have spread ‘conspiracy theories’ regarding the election, was sent to Comcast, AT&T, Spectrum, Dish, Verizon, Cox and Altice, as well as digital carriers Amazon, Apple, Google, Hulu and Roku.
The Democrats also accused conservative networks of “encouragement or incitement of violence.”
Eshoo and McNerney head the subcommittee on Communications and Technology, which will hold a hearing on “traditional media’s role in promoting disinformation and extremism” on Wednesday.
A press release for the hearing declared that there is an “increasing reliance on conspiracy theories and misleading or patently false information” among conservative news networks, and this “raises questions about their devotion to journalistic integrity.”
Republican Brendan Carr, who sits on the Federal Communications Commission, described the Democrats’ letter as “a chilling transgression” of free speech rights.
Carr added that Democrats are “sending a message that is as clear as it is troubling—these regulated entities will pay a price if the targeted newsrooms do not conform to Democrats’ preferred political narratives.”
Carr called for the FCC to “join me in publicly denouncing this attempt to stifle political speech and independent news judgment.”
The response on social media to the letter was led by independent journalist Glenn Greenwald:
There is no reasonable dispute that one of the top agenda items of Democrats now that they control the WH & Congress is to use their power to police and censor both social media and cable news. They're saying it explicitly. https://t.co/cfMHavJP6K
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) February 22, 2021
"journalistic integrity" like when Maddow on MSNBC babbled on about Russia "hacking the power grid" during a winter storm except like as we saw in Texas the reality was our own infrastructure took itself out and corporations made an enormous profit off of the tragedy.
— Currie Dobson (@Ventuckyspaz) February 23, 2021
"misinformation and conspiracy theories" = whatever those in charge don't like
— billy bob (@billy20151) February 23, 2021
Others noted that AT&T is the parent company of CNN, so censoring that networks direct rivals would be a bold move:
AT&T is a cable provider that also owns CNN. Ditto for Comcast and MSNBC. Federal law prohibits carriers from favoring their own networks – which they would be doing by canning FNC. You would think a congressperson would be at least vaguely familiar with FCC regulations.
— Thor Svensonn (@thorsvensonn) February 23, 2021
The Crucial Detail left out of the Representatives' Statement is while AT&T is the Parent Company of Content Distributors U-Verse, DirecTV and AT&T TV, it's also the Parent Company of CNN, which perpetuated a Russian Conspiracy Theory for the better part of 5 Years…
— Skip Coogler (@SkipCoogler) February 23, 2021
Trending
-
clownworld7 days ago
Bill Gates Bankrolling Educational Organization That Says Math is Racist
-
Coronavirus3 days ago
North Dakota House Votes To Make Mask Mandates Illegal
-
Coronavirus3 days ago
Video: Man Flying Back Into Canada Refuses Airport COVID Test
-
censorship3 days ago
Democrats Demand To Know Why Cable Companies Don’t CENSOR Conservative Media
-
Coronavirus1 day ago
Image Shows School Band ‘Socially Distanced’ Inside Human Tents
-
Globalism4 days ago
Catholic Cardinal Who Warned About Death of Western Civilization Removed by Pope
-
Climate Change7 days ago
The Truth About Bill Gates
-
Coronavirus3 days ago
UK: Health Authorities Announce Not a Single Case of Flu Detected This Year