Science & Tech
Cruz: Google Is The ‘Most Dangerous Company On The Face Of The Planet’
Describes big tech as the “single greatest threat” to “free and fair elections.”
Published
1 year agoon
Steve Watson

Senator Ted Cruz has continued his campaign against the unregulated expansion of Big Tech by labelling Google ‘the most dangerous company’ on the planet.
Cruz made the comments to reporters Saturday at a campaign event for the Georgia Senate runoff.
“I think hands down Google is the most dangerous company on the face of the planet. Google is the most dangerous because it’s the biggest by far. It is the most powerful by far. It controls the vast majority of searches people do,” Cruz noted after describing big tech as the “single greatest threat” to “free and fair elections.”
Watch Senator Ted Cruz expose Google, Twitter and Facebook. He says, "Google is the most dangerous company on this planet'.https://t.co/TeUalLcqrn
— OmShantiOm11🇮🇳 (@OmShantiSanghi) January 4, 2021
Cruz referred to the 2016 election where “Google, through manipulated search outcomes, shifted over 2.6 million votes in 2016 to the Democrats.”
Cruz noted that psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein, who testified before Cruz’s Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution “is not a Republican. He is a liberal Democrat who voted for Hillary Clinton but is outraged to see that kind of abuse of power. Google is clearly the most dangerous.”
Cruz added that while Google is the most dangerous, “Twitter is the most brazen.”
“We just recently had a hearing where Jack Dorsey testified with a beard that looked like he had crawled out from under a bridge,” Cruz noted.
During that hearing, Cruz asked Dorsey if he believes Twitter has the ability to influence election outcomes, to which Dorsey replied “no”… an answer Cruz described as “absurd.”
“If you don’t think you have the power to influence elections, why do you block anything?” Cruz countered, forcing Dorsey to admit that “more accountability is needed.”
CRUZ: "Does Twitter have the ability to influence elections?"
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) October 28, 2020
DORSEY: "No"
CRUZ: "If you don't think you have the power to influence elections, why do you block anything?" pic.twitter.com/6N21uxDvjw
Cruz then asked Dorsey “Who the hell elected you and put you in charge of what the media are allowed to report and what the American people are allowed to hear?”
“Mr. Dorsey, who the hell elected you?” Ted Cruz says.
— Bloomberg Technology (@technology) October 28, 2020
“We realize we need to earn trust more. We realize more accountability is needed," Jack Dorsey responds.
Twitter shares taking a hit after that round of questioning 📉https://t.co/YVXYzGhOZo pic.twitter.com/4TLDsgHZ8U
Speaking Saturday, Cruz urged “Look, Twitter brazenly censored the New York Post when it ran stories about Hunter Biden and Joe Biden’s corruption concerning China, concerning Ukraine and Russia, and they just silenced it. Not only did they prevent you and I from circulating those stories, for two weeks, they banned the New York Post.”
Indeed, the company did more than that, they even blocked users from tweeting out the link to the Post story.
“The New York Post is not some fly-by-night organization. It is the newspaper with the fourth-highest circulation in the country. It was founded by Alexander freakin’ Hamilton,” Cruz urged.
Cruz added that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has “benefited because Twitter and Google are so rotten that even though Facebook’s pretty bad, just saying free speech is important makes him appear markedly better than his rivals, but all three are very serious concerns.”
The Senate voted last week to pass the National Defense Authorization Act without the repeal of Section 230 that President Trump had requested:
Our Republican Senate just missed the opportunity to get rid of Section 230, which gives unlimited power to Big Tech companies. Pathetic!!! Now they want to give people ravaged by the China Virus $600, rather than the $2000 which they so desperately need. Not fair, or smart!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 1, 2021
You may like
-
Leftists Seethe Over Supreme Court Ruling
-
Maxine Waters: “To Hell With the Supreme Court! We Will Defy Them!”
-
“Illegitimate!” AOC Protests Against Abortion Ban
-
Rand Paul Says Gun Control Bill Was Kept ‘Secret’ And Senators Not Allowed Time To Read It
-
Video: Reporter Asks White House If Americans’ Only Choice Is “$5 A Gallon Gas Or A $61,000 Electric Car?”
-
New York Times Worries That Big Tech Won’t Censor Hard Enough During Midterm Elections
Science & Tech
I’m Sure This is Nothing to Worry About
Sure it’ll be fine.

Published
2 weeks agoon
13 June, 2022Should it concern us that the plot of Ex Machina could literally be playing out deep within the bowels of Google’s headquarters?
I’m sure this is nothing to worry about.
Please share this video! https://youtu.be/5OnmRyEAOwI
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.
———————————————————————————————————————
Science & Tech
AI Expert Says Parents Will Choose ‘Digital Babies’ in the Metaverse Over Real Ones Within 50 Years
In the name of saving the planet.

Published
4 weeks agoon
1 June, 2022
An expert on artificial intelligence says that within 50 years, parents will opt to have “digital offspring” that only exist in the metaverse due to concerns over the environment and overpopulation.
The prediction was made by Catriona Campbell, who is described as “one of the UK’s leading authorities on artificial intelligence.”
According to Campbell, parents will decide to have digital babies, an updated version of Japanese Tamagotchi digital pet toys, for the same reasons they are already choosing not to have real babies, namely, “concerns about the environment, overpopulation, the rising cost of bringing up a child.”
“Campbell predicts they will be commonplace and embraced by society within half a century,” reports left-wing newspaper the Guardian.
The AI expert says the cyberspace babies will eventually be indistinguishable from the real thing and that if parents get bored of them, they can just cancel them like they would a monthly Netflix subscription.
“Campbell says virtual children will look like you, and you will be able to play with and cuddle them. They will be capable of simulated emotional responses as well as speech, which will range from “googoo gaga” to backchat, as they grow older,” reports the newspaper.
#GreatReset: According to an expert on artificial intelligence, would-be parents will soon be able to opt for cheap and cuddle-able digital offspring. https://t.co/WYBjRnkkoU
— Geopolitics & Empire (@Geopolitics_Emp) May 31, 2022
The article also says concerns that the digital babies would just be ‘creepy dystopian dolls’ that can be turned on and off are “old fashioned.”
“Think of the advantages: minimal cost and environmental impact. And less worry,” it adds.
As ever, this is just more anti-natal propaganda, predominantly targeting white western countries, which are already seeing birth rates rapidly decline.
There is an entire cottage industry of social engineering based on convincing westerners not to have children.
As we previously highlighted, in 2020, CNN marked Valentines Day weekend by promoting “the benefits of being single,” even as birth rates across America and Europe continue to plunge.
America’s fertility rate currently stands at 1.8 births per woman.
From 2007 to 2011 the fertility rate in the U.S. declined 9% in the space of just 4 years.
In 2016, the U.S. fertility rate fell to 59.8 births per 1,000 women, the lowest since records began.
Fears about “overpopulation” are also a contrived myth given that plummeting population levels are far more likely to be a bigger problem in 50 years time.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.
———————————————————————————————————————
Science & Tech
Australian Primary School Sees “Microchips in Student’s Brains” in 10 Years
School deleted newsletter containing creepy prophecy, but the Internet never forgets.

Published
4 weeks agoon
1 June, 2022
An Australian primary school predicted “microchips in student’s brains” within 10 years before subsequently deleting the newsletter that contained the creepy prophecy.
The bizarre entry was featured in the May 26 edition of the Preston West Primary school’s newsletter, which listed a number of prosaic things the school envisages will be helpful to educating children in a decade.
They include “more mental health awareness,” “more buildings and development,” as well as “technological advances for teachers and students.”
However, also included on this list is “microchips in student’s brains to promote intelligence and memory.”
Although the newsletter was deleted by the school (it appears all their newsletters have been wiped), proof it was originally posted can be seen via the Google search cache below.
As we have previously highlighted, implantable microchips are moving closer to becoming commonplace, particularly as countries embrace the digital ID and a cashless society.
The BBC recently reported on people getting implanted with microchips in their arms in order to make purchases in a more convenient way.
We also highlighted how people in Sweden are willingly having COVID vaccine passports placed onto implantable microchips in their hands.
Cartoon villain and World Economic Forum chief Klaus Schwab wrote in his book ‘The Great Reset’ that the fourth industrial revolution would “lead to a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity,” which in his book he clarifies is implantable microchips that can read your thoughts.
During last week’s Davos meeting of global elitists, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla explained to Schwab how soon there would be “ingestible pills” – a pill with a tiny microchip chip that would send a wireless signal to relevant authorities when the pharmaceutical has been consumed.
“Imagine the compliance,” said Bourla.
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla explains Pfizer's new tech to Davos crowd: "ingestible pills" – a pill with a tiny chip that send a wireless signal to relevant authorities when the pharmaceutical has been digested. "Imagine the compliance," he says pic.twitter.com/uYapKJGDJx
— Jeremy Loffredo (@loffredojeremy) May 20, 2022
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.
———————————————————————————————————————
Trending
-
Politics5 days ago
Ukraine Bans Main Opposition Party, Seizes All Its Assets
-
Immigration5 days ago
Staff at Refugee Facility Warned They Will Have to Handle Violence, Anti-Social Behavior and Death
-
Politics2 days ago
Biden Given ‘Cheat Sheet’ That Instructs Him How to Say “Hello” And Sit Down
-
Politics6 days ago
Macron Shocked as Le Pen’s Party Makes Huge Gains
-
clownworld5 days ago
US Navy Releases Bizarre Training Video Urging Recruits to Create Pronoun “Safe Space”
-
U.S. News2 days ago
Rand Paul Says Gun Control Bill Was Kept ‘Secret’ And Senators Not Allowed Time To Read It
-
Economy4 days ago
Pathetic: Only 11 Per Cent Believe Biden Narrative That Putin is to Blame For Record Gas Prices
-
Immigration4 days ago
Student Kicked Out of UK College For Supporting Deportation of Illegal Immigrants