censorship
Leftists Cry And Moan To Spotify As Alex Jones Appears On Joe Rogan Podcast
Nancy Pelosi’s kid, journalists for censorship, and an army of bedwetters demand action
Published
2 years agoon
Steve Watson

Leftists were triggered Tuesday as Infowars guru Alex Jones was able to appear on a big tech platform without being censored or banned.
Jones was once again a guest on The Joe Rogan Experience, however, it was the first time Jones has appeared since Rogan moved to Spotify, prompting scores of butthurt leftists to immediately begin lobbying the streaming service to take down the episode.
The Independent complained that “Rogan and Jones appeared in a photo that showed them failing to practise social distancing,” before noting that “critics called out Spotify for hosting Jones via the episode when he is supposed to have been banned from the platform.”
Christine Pelosi, Nancy Pelosi’s kid, claimed that “Alex Jones posted death threats against me. He called Sandy Hook a hoax and harassed mourning families. Now he is lying about covid vaccines. His hate speech is not just vile – it’s dangerous. WTH Spotify?”
Alex Jones posted death threats against me. He called Sandy Hook a hoax and harassed mourning families. Now he is lying about #covid vaccines. His hate speech is not just vile – it’s dangerous. WTH @Spotify? https://t.co/iRXTlrnARW
— Christine Pelosi (@sfpelosi) October 27, 2020
Pelosi picked up on posts from “free speech activist” Nathan Bernard, who seemed to be exclusively calling for Jones’ and Rogan’s free speech to be shut down:
Joe Rogan says kids are "getting polio from taking vaccines" after Alex Jones spreads conspiracy that Bill Gates is trafficking vaccines that get 100% of people sick.
Great work hosting this, @spotify. pic.twitter.com/y6n6PWRxtE
— Nathan Bernard (@nathanTbernard) October 27, 2020
I am assuming the "free speech activist" in your bio is a joke.
— Jaded Misanthrope🌺☯️☮️ (@SoulsOfTheFree) October 27, 2020
As soon as they heard that Jones was on the podcast, Leftist “reporters” began harassing Spotify demanding to know why Jones isn’t banned
Weirdly Spotify didn’t respond to my question about why Alex Jones’ show is banned from the platform for “hate speech,” but it’s cool for him to appear for 3+ hours on someone else’s show on the platform. https://t.co/mn0sNgIjMA
— Max Tani (@maxwelltani) October 28, 2020
“Weirdly, no one outside of Twitter gives a fuck what I think.” -Max Tani
— The White Visitation (@R0g3rM3xic0) October 28, 2020
Weirdly, imagine your job being to eliminate interesting people from planet earth. https://t.co/8k8BdN1OYW
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) October 28, 2020
I'm so sorry this is happening to you.
— ch85sports (@ch85sports) October 28, 2020
Their answer would have obviously been "because this isn't Nazi Germany"
— allen (@thebrooktown) October 28, 2020
"Journalists for Censorship"
— InTheRightColumn (@TheRightColumn) October 28, 2020
Sticks and stones will break my bones but corporations that allow “misinformation” (stuff I don’t like) must be tattled to.
— Uncle Scar (@ScarGroyper) October 28, 2020
CNN’s resident bed wetter also got in on the act:
Here is Spotify's Joe Rogan giving Alex Jones a platform after Spotify deplatformed Jones back in 2018. https://t.co/tDjijPjNt4
— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) October 27, 2020
Journalists: Lobby to have any original, interesting, fun, authentic person silenced in a culture of insipid, sterile boredom.
Also journalists: "Why does everyone hate us?"
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) October 28, 2020
Imagine being so pathetic and boring that you are forced to craft an entire career out of lobbying for all the interesting people to be banned, so your tedious, insipid ass is all that's left.
…and yet still no one is interested in what you have to say.
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) October 28, 2020
This needs to be censored immediately
— James T. (@jamest1128) October 27, 2020
Aside from spewing their usual vitriol against Jones, Soros propaganda arm Media Matters also went after Comedian Tim Dillon, who appeared alongside Jones and Rogan on the podcast, insinuating that he is a racist for expressing disdain over Democrat efforts to defund police.
Other leftists cried to Spotify, threatening to cancel their accounts, along with the hashtag #cancelspotify, which is highly ironic given that a large portion of Jones and Rogan’s conversation centred around cancel culture:
There is a time and place in history where you take a stand with your wallet. This is it.
Cancel your @Spotify Subscription, NOW. https://t.co/LsZ5rOkXfF— Akhi's Bytes and NASA's Flights(fr sale on amazon) (@AkhisBytes) October 27, 2020
Cancelling @Spotify now. https://t.co/xXltMTgwEs
— Feckless Tunt (@kindapettybetty) October 27, 2020
Hey @Spotify. I just cancelled my Premium account. If you'd ever like my money back, can it with this shit. https://t.co/B9SlG9WELv
— Michael Dobozy (Progressives Show Up to Work) (@dobozysaurus) October 27, 2020
I’ve been a @Spotify user since Rdio went the way of the Buffalo, and @replyall is one of my fave podcasts. But I don’t want to give money to people that finance this BS. https://t.co/qk5Q5bWgtp
— Jason Kozemczak (@jak) October 27, 2020
Cry some more…
Cry some more 😯 pic.twitter.com/ZVEPrinGbM
— IGGMU (@Angiliano1) October 27, 2020
Given that Jones’ last appearance on Rogan was the most listened to podcast in a decade, Spotify is likely not all that worried about these 14 snowflakes canceling:
🔽THIS is why I cancelled my @Spotify subscription. https://t.co/jURuHRF7f2
— Juan Salvo (@j_salvo) October 27, 2020
Hey @spotify, before I cancel my account with you anything to say regarding this? Does seeking audience numbers justify this? Very disappointing. https://t.co/dJ48aWpb8m
— David Hughes (@davidhughes) October 27, 2020
Thanks for reminding me to cancel my @Spotify account. https://t.co/4Ard8NYBFJ
— Jason Cross (@JasonCross00) October 27, 2020
I really don't want to cancel my Spotify subscription, but like, this is literally an attack vector for misinformation. https://t.co/FpZScEwmWr
— Terry Gotham (@TerryGotham) October 27, 2020
You may like
-
Sex Strike!
-
Videos: Democrats Saying They Support Abortions Without ANY Limits
-
Video: Abortion Laws Worldwide Are More Restrictive Than In The U.S.
-
Video: CNN’s Tapper Tries And Fails To Get British PM To Trash America
-
Fact Checkers Demand YouTube Censor Competitors Because No One is Watching Their Content
-
New Bill Would Mandate Federal Reserve to Promote “Racial and Economic Justice”
censorship
Fact Checkers Demand YouTube Censor Competitors Because No One is Watching Their Content
“It doesn’t seem to do very well.”

Published
13 hours agoon
27 June, 2022
‘Fact checkers’ are demanding that YouTube censor more videos for “misinformation,” with one of the reasons being that no one is watching their content.
Well, this is awkward.
The censorship demand was made during the GlobalFact 9, a fact-checking conference organized by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN).
“As an international network of fact-checking organizations, we monitor how lies spread online — and every day, we see that YouTube is one of the major conduits of online disinformation and misinformation worldwide. This is a significant concern among our global fact-checking community,” the IFCN previously wrote in a letter to YouTube.
During the conference itself, Angie Drobnic Holan, editor-in-chief of PolitiFact, complained that fact checker groups are struggling because no one is interested in watching their content.
“YouTube does not seem to raise accurate, credible information in its algorithms. We have had a lot of experience with YouTube making videos of fact-checking content. It doesn’t seem to do very well,” Holan. “I think most news organizations are extremely frustrated with your platform,” she added.
In other words, no one cares about boring, hyper-partisan content put out by dubious ‘fact checker’ groups, therefore their more successful competition must be censored!
YouTube’s Brandon Feldman responded by assuring the group it was doing more to elevate “authoritative sources.”
On YouTube, this manifests itself in the form of content from mainstream news networks and regime institutions appearing at the top of search results, with dissenting narratives buried deep down the list, if they appear at all.
But apparently, not even this is enough.
As we previously highlighted, the co-founder of one of the world’s leading ‘fact checker’ organizations, which presents itself as a supreme authority on which sources of information can be trusted, labeled the now completely confirmed genuine Hunter Biden laptop story a “hoax”.
The Wuhan lab leak, a theory now accepted by the head of the World Health Organization, was also once shadow banned as a result of it being declared a “conspiracy theory” by fact checkers.
Whenever stories emerge that are hugely damaging to the regime and the military-industrial complex, fact checkers are weaponized to bury them by falsely labeling such stories ‘misleading’ or hoaxes even if they are completely authentic.
This then serves to justify their censorship by social media algorithms and the targeted banning and deplatforming of anyone who tries to amplify them.
Fact checkers aren’t impartial, independent outlets, they are merely hyper-partisan information attack dogs working on behalf of the regime.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.
———————————————————————————————————————
censorship
New York Times Worries That Big Tech Won’t Censor Hard Enough During Midterm Elections
Complains about success of ‘2000 Mules’.

Published
4 days agoon
24 June, 2022
The New York Times has published an article expressing its concerns that Big Tech platforms like Facebook and Twitter aren’t doing enough to censor “misinformation” in the run-up to the midterm elections.
The article complains that Meta (Facebook) has slashed its ‘election misinformation’ team from 300 people during 2020 to just 60 people and that Mark Zuckerberg no longer meets with the team directly.
Civil rights groups are also apparently upset that Zuckerberg is less interested in communicating with them about efforts to stop ‘election misinformation’.
According to the piece, Twitter is also likely to be less censorious towards election information due to the likelihood that it is about to be purchased by Elon Musk.
“I’m concerned,” President of the NAACP Derrick Johnson told the newspaper. “It appears to be out of sight, out of mind.”
Noting that there are numerous political candidates running for office in 2022 who agree with Donald Trump that the 2020 presidential election was stolen, the Times laments that Meta’s reduction in censorship “could have far-reaching consequences as faith in the U.S. electoral system reaches a brittle point.”
The article also whines about the viral success of Dinesh D’Souza’s documentary ‘2000 Mules’, which received over a million views on alternative video hosting platform Rumble and also received 430,000 “interactions” on Facebook, proof according to the newspaper that election misinformation is “rampant” online.
Representatives from both Facebook and Twitter responded by assuring the Times that they are still keenly focused on censoring election “misinformation.”
“Before the 2020 US presidential election, Big Tech platforms deployed unprecedented levels of censorship by censoring then-President Donald Trump numerous times, banning popular pro-Trump groups, and more,” writes Reclaim the Net.
“Post-election, this mass censorship continued with President Trump being permanently banned by all the major tech platforms, discussions of “widespread fraud or errors” changing the 2020 US presidential election outcome being banned, free speech platform Parler (which many users had flocked to in an attempt to escape Big Tech’s censorship) being deplatformed by the tech giants, and more.”
“The mainstream media and Big Tech used the vague, subjective term “election misinformation” to justify this silencing of a sitting US President and the mass censorship of election-related speech.
The legacy media is once again likely to weaponize hyper-partisan ‘fact checkers’ to ensure that information which isn’t completely censored is at least shadow banned and relegated by algorithms so fewer Americans will see it.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.
———————————————————————————————————————
censorship
“I Don’t Believe in Censoring Art”: Paramount CEO Rejects Trigger Warnings
“You don’t have to watch anything you don’t want to.”

Published
4 days agoon
23 June, 2022
Paramount CEO Bob Bakish has refused to add trigger warnings to the company’s historical content, asserting, “I don’t believe in censoring art.”
Bakish says the back catalogue for the film studio’s new subscription streaming service Paramount+ will not be censored to please modern politically correct sensibilities.
“By definition, you have some things that were made in a different time and reflect different sensibilities,” Bakish said.
“I don’t believe in censoring art that was made historically, that’s probably a mistake. It’s all on-demand – you don’t have to watch anything you don’t want to.”
As we have previously highlighted, other streaming platforms and broadcasters have censored or outright deleted old shows and movies for containing so-called ‘offensive’ content.
Earlier this year, UK streaming platform ITV Player censored a “homophobic” line from the 2002 Spiderman movie when Spiderman says to Bonesaw, “That’s a cute outfit. Did your husband give it to you?”
During the height of the 2020 Black Lives Matter riots, UK broadcaster Sky also tagged numerous movies, some little over a decade old, with a message warning viewers that they might be offensive.
“This film has outdated attitudes, language and cultural depictions which may cause offence today,” stated the trigger warning.
During the same year, PBS removed Gone With the Wind from its platform, in the process erasing the first black female actress to win an Oscar, while the BBC also announced it was removing Little Britain from its schedule despite the fact that the TV comedy series satirizes every demographic, often highlighting small minded attitudes of bigots.
Last year, NBC also announced that it was scanning 17,000 hours of past WWE content to weed out “racist” material in order to avoid it appearing on the network’s new Peacock streaming device.
Iconic historical books are also being re-written to reflect ‘modern attitudes’, including George Orwell’s 1984.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.
———————————————————————————————————————
Trending
-
Politics6 days ago
Ukraine Bans Main Opposition Party, Seizes All Its Assets
-
Politics4 days ago
Biden Given ‘Cheat Sheet’ That Instructs Him How to Say “Hello” And Sit Down
-
Immigration6 days ago
Staff at Refugee Facility Warned They Will Have to Handle Violence, Anti-Social Behavior and Death
-
clownworld7 days ago
US Navy Releases Bizarre Training Video Urging Recruits to Create Pronoun “Safe Space”
-
U.S. News3 days ago
Rand Paul Says Gun Control Bill Was Kept ‘Secret’ And Senators Not Allowed Time To Read It
-
Economy6 days ago
Pathetic: Only 11 Per Cent Believe Biden Narrative That Putin is to Blame For Record Gas Prices
-
Immigration5 days ago
Student Kicked Out of UK College For Supporting Deportation of Illegal Immigrants
-
Economy3 days ago
Video: Reporter Asks White House If Americans’ Only Choice Is “$5 A Gallon Gas Or A $61,000 Electric Car?”