Connect with us

Epstein

Lawsuit: Epstein Cited Friendship With Bill Clinton To Carry Out “Vicious, Prolonged Sexual Assault”

“When I chose a seat on the jet, Jeffrey told me that his good friend, Bill Clinton, always chose to sit there.”

Published

on

JOYCE NALTCHAYAN/AFP via Getty Images

Documents made public as part of a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein’s estate have alleged that the billionaire cited his ‘friendship’ with Bill Clinton as a way of intimidating a fifteen year old girl into sleeping with him.

The Documents, identifying the victim only as ‘Jane Doe’ claim that Epstein carried out a “vicious, prolonged sexual assault” on her in 2004 after trafficking her on the infamous ‘Lolita express’ to his New Mexico ranch.

“Epstein made clear to Jane Doe 15 how powerful he was. He made a point of mentioning that he was close with Bill Clinton,” the documents note.

“When I chose a seat on the jet, Jeffrey told me that his good friend, Bill Clinton, always chose to sit there,” the accuser has claimed.

The documents allege that dropping Clinton’s name was Epstein’s way of conveying “how powerful he was and how helpful he could be in assisting Jane Doe 15 with her future goals, such as paying for college” as long as she went along with his perverted desires.

The lawsuit also alleges that Epstein told the girl, now in her 30’s, that he liked women to sleep at his feet, which “made her immediately think of slaves.”


US court filings

The development comes on the heels this week of never before seen photos emerging of Clinton receiving a massage from Jeffrey Epstein ‘sex slave’ Chauntae Davies, who was just 22 at the time, adding to the already bursting portfolio of questionable connections Clinton shared with the billionaire pedophile.

Continue Reading
Comments

Epstein

Prosecutors Say Prince Andrew ‘Next Target’ After Ghislaine Maxwell Sentenced To 20 Years

“Obviously, Andrew is one of the targets they will be looking into. He should definitely be concerned”

Published

on

Steve Watson

Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images

Following the relatively light twenty year sentence Ghislaine Maxwell has received for sex trafficking underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein, prosecutors representing the victims have said that the ‘next target’ should be British Royal Prince Andrew.

The lawyers acting on behalf of those alleging abuse requested that the FBI continue investigating the Epstein case and look harder at Andrew and other individuals accused by the victims.

“Let’s hope they’re the next target,” Attorney Brad Edwards told reporters.

Edwards represented Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who settled a sex abuse civil lawsuit out of court with Andrew, the Duke of York.

Attorney Spencer Kuvin, representative of several other alleged victims of Epstein and Maxwell added “Obviously, Andrew is one of the targets they will be looking into. He should definitely be concerned, but if he did nothing wrong, then come forward and tell the full story to the FBI, not the media.”

Los Angeles lawyer Lisa Bloom, who is representing several other alleged victims said “We call upon the FBI to fully investigate Prince Andrew. Virginia Giuffre’s civil case should be just the beginning. Everyone associated with Epstein and Maxwell should be carefully investigated.”

Bloom previously told reporters that Prince Andrew “should be quaking in his boots.”

As we previously reported, the British public have expressed concerns that the money for Andrew’s pay off to Virginia Roberts Giuffre, which will likely run into the millions, will be siphoned from taxpayers.

The amount that Andrew will pay Giuffre, and a victims’ rights charity of her choice, has not been disclosed, however it is estimated to be in excess of £12 MILLION, and that won’t even include legal fees.

While not admitting any guilt in the case, a statement read in court noted that “Prince Andrew has never intended to malign Ms. Giuffre’s character, and he accepts that she has suffered both as an established victim of abuse and as a result of unfair public attacks.”

The settlement came just days before Andrew would have been made to undergo a deposition, and be questioned under oath by Giuffre’s lawyers, reported the New York Times.

No individuals other than Maxwell and Epstein have yet been named in court throughout the case.

Maxwell will likely serve her sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury, Connecticut, a low security 1000-inmate facility about 55 miles from New York City. The prison is said to be like Disneyland compared to the facility Maxwell has resided for the past two years.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter:

———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/ PJW Shop

ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

  • Continue Reading

    Epstein

    “Who Is Footing The Bill?”: Prince Andrew Settled With Epstein Accuser And Brits Want To Know If They Are Paying For It

    “This is our money isn’t it?”

    Published

    on

    Steve Watson

    Samir Hussein/WireImage/Getty Images

    Prince Andrew has agreed on an out of court settlement with Virginia Giuffre, who accused him of raping her when she was underage after being groomed by Jeffrey Epstein. Now British people want to know where the money for the pay off is coming from, given that it will likely run into the millions.

    The amount that Andrew will pay Giuffre, and a victims’ rights charity of her choice, has not been disclosed, however it is estimated to be in excess of £12 MILLION, and that won’t even include legal fees.

    While not admitting any guilt in the case, a statement read in court noted that “Prince Andrew has never intended to malign Ms. Giuffre’s character, and he accepts that she has suffered both as an established victim of abuse and as a result of unfair public attacks.”

    The settlement comes days before Andrew would have been made to undergo a deposition, and be questioned under oath by Giuffre’s lawyers, reports the New York Times.

    The BBC reports that already questions are being raised as to where the funds will be coming from, noting:

    Although the exact amount of the financial settlement has not been revealed, reports have speculated that it could run into millions of pounds. The duke receives a Royal Navy pension and a stipend from the Queen’s Duchy of Lancaster income.

    Kate Macnab, a lawyer at Reeds Solicitors, said: “It is likely there will be some demands to know where the payment is coming from – public or private purse?”

    And Graham Smith from the anti-monarchy group Republic said taxpayers deserved to know where the money for the settlement was coming from.

    Brits are now asking if this is something else they are going to have to foot the bill for:

    SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

    Follow on Twitter:

    ———————————————————————————————————————
    Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/ PJW Shop

    ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

    We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

    Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

    Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

  • Continue Reading

    Epstein

    BBC Forced To Apologise For Interviewing Accused Epstein Attorney About Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial

    Alan Dershowitz, accused of sex trafficking by Epstein victim, claims interview was “entirely appropriate”

    Published

    on

    Steve Watson

    Screenshot

    The BBC has apologised for interviewing Alan Dershowitz, the lawyer who helped Jeffrey Epstein stay out of prison in 2008, and one of the key associates accused of sex trafficking by by Virginia Giuffre, regarding the outcome of Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial.

    The BBC brought on Dershowitz without properly explaining his intimate connection to Epstein, giving the impression that he was an impartial correspondent.

    The network announced Dershowitz as just a “constitutional lawyer”:

    After public outcry, the BBC was forced to apologise and vowed to “look into how this happened”:

    Remarkably, Dershowitz himself hit back, claiming that it was “entirely appropriate” for the BBC to interview him:

    Dershowitz has denied Giuffre’s claims and sued her for defamation in 2019.

    SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

    Follow on Twitter:

    ———————————————————————————————————————
    Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/ PJW Shop

    ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

    We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

    Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

    Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

  • Continue Reading

    Trending