Portland continues to burn at the hands of Antifa agitators who are using a court order that has prevented Federal officers from taking action against the press. In other words, rioters are holding cameras and claiming the Feds can’t touch them because they are ‘journalists’.

With the Democratic Mayor refusing to order police to crackdown on rioters, federal officers have stepped in and been somewhat effective. However, as RT reports, a federal judge last week issued a temporary restraining order on the agents, forbidding any action against anyone ‘reporting’ on the scene.

Now, some on the ground in Portland, are relating that antifa rioters are using this to their advantage:

This fake Antifa press problem is a pandemic

This man defies orders, insults officers, and makes sexual references to them

And claims he’s press with a $40 handicam mounted on a gas station tripod

Due to a court order police can’t do anything

This puts real press in danger pic.twitter.com/cVvenAof0S

— ELIJAH RIOT (@ElijahSchaffer) July 27, 2020

Damn the fake press! I think there are more fake Antifa press than there are real press here

A mob of them scream about having the right to rush officers due to press immunity

move towards the Feds aggressively

then they fire rubber bullets & flash bangs at the real press pic.twitter.com/0OsUA82K4X

— ELIJAH RIOT (@ElijahSchaffer) July 27, 2020

FAKE PRESS 🚨

This rioter gets pissed when Feds aim their sights down on her after she provokes them. She claimed to be press. @ElijahSchaffer has posted the moments leading up to me pressing her. pic.twitter.com/AayCHnQ7c8

— Kalen From Scriberr (@FromKalen) July 27, 2020

Antifa Rioters are posing as press in Portland riots

Press do not engage in political activity during protests or riots, unless undercover

This is putting open reporters at risk to being caught in the cross fire

Antifa is deteriorating our constitutional system from within

— Drew Hernandez (@livesmattershow) July 26, 2020

Armed Leftist shot this weekend during a BLM protest, after he and a mob swarmed a man’s car. He learns quickly that there are consequences for his actions…

Some so called ‘reporters’ are openly bragging about aligning with rioters:

The first taste is always the best pic.twitter.com/cl5nIMFEax

— Laura Jedeed (Misanthrophile) (@1misanthrophile) July 26, 2020

Recent reports from Portland have documented the violence, with conservatives being targeted, and law enforcement even being doxxed by antifa, and Federal agents being ‘blinded’ with lasers.

Meanwhile, Democrats are adamant that the violence isn’t really happening:

A video out of Dublin, Ireland shows shows left-wing Antifa activists protesting against an anti-pedophilia march.

The March For Innocence was organized as a protest against children’s minster Roderic O’Gorman, who is under fire for appearing in a photograph with LGBT activist Peter Tatchell in 2018.

Over the past week, O’Gorman disavowed Tatchell after learning that the campaigner supports lowering the age of sexual consent to 14-years-old providing there is no more than two or three years difference between the ages.

The rally was also a demonstration against exposing children to experimental cross-sex hormones, “extremist” sex education at a young age and drag queens.

Apparently, opposing any of this makes one a far-right fascist and subject to counter-protest by Antifa.

WATCH: Anti-Paedophilia protestors clash with Antifa during #MarchforInnocence. Article on the day's events forthcoming. pic.twitter.com/P3ElAdkCmO

— The Burkean (@TheBurkeanIE) July 11, 2020

The clip shows March For Innocence demonstrators being interrupted by Antifa radicals holding a sign that says “All You Fascists Bound to Lose.”

The leftists are immediately confronted by March For Innocence protesters, who try to grab their banner before scuffles ensue.

“Gardai intervened in one incident in which there were no injuries or arrests and remained at the scene to ensure public safety,” responded police in a statement. “All persons present later dispersed without further incident.”

Imagine thinking it’s good optics to oppose a march against pedophilia. The mind boggles.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

———————————————————————————————————————

My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.

Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

———————————————————————————————————————

A social experiment by Ami Horowitz shows New Yorkers gleefully signing a petition to take down statues of “slave owners” like George Washington, but suddenly becoming reticent when Horowitz mentions the Prophet Muhammad.

“I want to take down all statues of people who owned slaves in this country,” Horowitz told potential signatories, emphasizing how he wanted to remove the statue of George Washington in DC.

All of the people featured in the video gleefully signed the petition to take down statues of “slave owners” like Washington and Jefferson.

However, when it came to another infamous historical slave owner, their enthusiasm suddenly waned.

“I want to take down a statue of Muhammad, the founder of Islam, because he also owned slaves,” Horowitz tells a black woman.

“OK, I don’t want to sign this,” she responds.

Every other person in the clip refuses to sign the petition to remove statues of Muhammad.

Asked why people are signing the petition to take down Washington’s statue but not the one applying to Muhammad, one man argues that it’s because of “religious freedom.”

“But slavery’s not part of religious freedom,” responds Horowitz.

Obviously, there are no statues of the Prophet Muhammad, but nobody is calling for mosques to be demolished, despite the fact that Muhammad owned slaves.

As the BBC highlights, “The Prophet Muhammad did not try to abolish slavery, and bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves himself.”

However, the rest of the article strenuously argues that because Muhammad treated his slaves well and encouraged others to do the same, that this made his slave ownership acceptable.

The same justification probably wouldn’t go down as well when applied to Washington or Jefferson.

The social experiment underscores how slave ownership is almost certainly not the real reason for leftists wanting to see statues of Washington and Jefferson toppled.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

———————————————————————————————————————

My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.

Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

———————————————————————————————————————