Connect with us

Coronavirus

Study: Global Pandemic Could Have Been Avoided If China Had Acted Sooner

Instead, the communist state lied and tried to cover it up.

Published

8 months ago

on

Xinhua/Xie Huanchi via Getty Images

A scientific study has found that had China acted sooner to combat the spread of their coronavirus, then the spread could have been almost entirely avoided, and it would not have become a global pandemic.

Research out of the University of Southampton in the UK, based on world population mapping funded primarily by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, discovered “that if interventions in [China] could have been conducted one week, two weeks, or three weeks earlier, cases could have been reduced by 66 percent, 86 percent and 95 percent respectively – significantly limiting the geographical spread of the disease.”

Study author Dr Shengjie Lai, of the University of Southampton, comments: “Our study demonstrates how important it is for countries which are facing an imminent outbreak to proactively plan a coordinated response which swiftly tackles the spread of the disease on a number of fronts.”

Director of the University of Southampton’s WorldPop group, Professor Andy Tatem, adds: “We have a narrow window of opportunity globally to respond to this disease and given effective drugs and vaccines are not expected for months, we need to be smart about how we target it using non-drug-related interventions.”

“Our findings significantly contribute to an improved understanding of how best to implement measures and tailor them to conditions in different regions of the world.” Tatem continued.

It has become clear that the first cases of the Chinese virus were reported in mid-late November and early December, with scientists even estimating that the first jump of the virus from animals to humans probably occurred in October in the city of Wuhan.

Instead of acting immediately, the Chinese government waited until January 23rd before issuing quarantine orders to the 11 million people living in Wuhan.

The communist state was also actively working to suppress and punish doctors and scientists who tried to get warnings out, and  lied to the world by claiming there was “no evidence” of human-to-human transmission.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Comments

Coronavirus

NHS Nurse Publicly Resigns, Blasts COVID Lockdown Policy

“Unfortunately, I can’t lie anymore.”

Published

2 days ago

on

5 November, 2020

Video Screenshot

An NHS nurse in Britain publicly resigned while wearing her uniform before releasing the real numbers of COVID patients in her hospital and denouncing the government’s disastrous lockdown policy.

The whole of England officially entered lockdown 2.0 today despite numerous experts warning that lockdowns will eventually end up killing more people than coronavirus itself.

A video out of Cornwall shows a nurse in uniform giving a speech explaining why she decided to resign from her job.

“I don’t need the uniform to prove that I work for them, but today, I’m publicly resigning,” she stated.

The nurse then revealed how she received an email from her bosses demanding an explanation as to why she was being critical of official COVID policy and that people were “reporting” her.

“Unfortunately I can’t lie anymore,” said the nurse, explaining how she took a screenshot of internal hospital data showing there were just three people across three hospitals in the region infected with COVID.

The total deaths from these three hospitals across the last 7 months is just 76 people, roughly 10 deaths a month, according to the nurse, who questioned why it was necessary for her region to go into lockdown given such sparse figures.

“I’ve decided there’s no point, I have gone against the rules within the NHS, I have shared confidential information that people need to see,” said the nurse, adding that other doctors and nurses were trying to speak out.

As we highlighted earlier, the enforcement of a new lockdown is likely to bring with it more draconian measures of enforcement.

A woman in Skipton was threatened with a police visit for not downloading the NHS COVID ‘track and trace’ app, while another woman in Wales was questioned by police on whether buying custard counted as an ‘essential purchase’.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter:

———————————————————————————————————————

ALERT!

null

New limited edition merch now available! Click here.

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

Also, I urgently need your financial support here.

———————————————————————————————————————

Continue Reading

Coronavirus

British Woman Threatened With Police Visit For Not Downloading NHS Corona Tracking App

Even though it’s voluntary.

Published

2 days ago

on

5 November, 2020

Peter Summers/Getty Images

A British woman says she was threatened with police visiting her home if she did not download the NHS coronavirus ‘track and trace’ app.

LockdownSkeptics.org features the story of a woman from Skipton who tested positive for COVID-19 and immediately self-isolated.

“This was followed by “in excess” of 20 text messages demanding that she download the NHS App. She did not do so since she doesn’t want to be followed round by it and she’s self-isolating anyway. She was then telephoned by the Test and Trace system and the caller threatened her with a “police check at your address if you do not download the app.” Utterly furious, she ended the phone call and is waiting to see what happens next.”

The NHS ‘track and trace’ app is completely voluntary and authorities have no grounds to enforce its adoption legally. This is yet another example of how bureaucratic control freaks are simply inventing laws and justifying the intimidation others by means of coronavirus hysteria.

As we previously highlighted, authorities appear to be deploying more draconian crackdown measures as more stringent lockdown measures are reintroduced.

This includes cases where police are quizzing people on what they are about to purchase before they enter grocery stores.

As of last night, England entered another debilitating nationwide lockdown that will last until at least December 1st.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter:

———————————————————————————————————————

ALERT!

null

New limited edition merch now available! Click here.

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

Also, I urgently need your financial support here.

———————————————————————————————————————

Continue Reading

Coronavirus

Corona Lockdown Cops Quizzing People on Their Food Purchases

Officers ask Welsh woman if custard is an ‘essential item’.

Published

4 days ago

on

3 November, 2020

Ben Birchall - PA Images/Getty Images

Corona lockdown cops in Wales quizzed a woman about what items she was about to purchase from a grocery store in another example of how COVID-19 rules are being wrongly enforced.

The country is currently under a ‘Tier 3’ lockdown which means that everything has been completely shut down apart from supermarkets and other grocery stores.

According to a resident of Monkton, a small village in Wales, police stopped her before she entered a branch of the Spar convenience store and questioned her about what she was planning to buy.

The woman said police asked her where she was going before she answered that she was going to Spar to buy custard.

Cops then asked if custard was an ‘essential’ item, to which the woman asked, “Well, would you have crumble without custard?”

The officers took no further action but the fact that they appear to have no grasp of the law, which doesn’t give them power to control what people buy from shops, is alarming.

As we reported last month, the Welsh government initially ordered supermarkets to cover up “non-essential items,” including sanitary products, books and clothing, a decision which led to a massive backlash.

This is by no means the first time people have been questioned by police about their shopping habits in the name of preventing the spread of COVID.

Back in April we highlighted how police in Scotland issued a fine to a shopper who bought wine and potato chips during the coronavirus lockdown, claiming that these were “non-essential” items.

Another man reported that his friend’s daughter had also been fined £30 for buying wine and snacks.

Another man in London claimed he was arrested and fined by police for buying wine, despite this not being a violation of the lockdown laws.

Northamptonshire Police also threatened to start searching people’s shopping baskets in order to catch coronavirus lockdown violators, but later had to reverse the policy following a public backlash.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter:

———————————————————————————————————————

ALERT!

null

New limited edition merch now available! Click here.

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

Also, I urgently need your financial support here.

———————————————————————————————————————

Continue Reading

Trending