Connect with us

Politics

The Real Reason Warren Refused to Shake Bernie’s Hand

He completely humiliated her.

Published

on

The media is missing the real reason Elizabeth Warren refused to shake Bernie Sanders’ hand after last night’s Democratic debate.

Following the conclusion of the event, Sanders went to shake Warren’s hand, but she clenched her fist and engaged in a terse conversation with the socialist Senator. Bernie then pointed at Warren and held his hands up.

Earlier in the debate, Sanders was asked about Warren’s claim that he told her in 2018 that a woman could never win the presidency.

Despite Sanders denying the accusation and referencing decades old footage where he had said the opposite, the CNN host immediately asked Sanders, “What did you think when Senator Sanders told you a woman could not win the election?”

Warren then played the identity politics card by asserting that the only people on the stage who had not lost elections were the women.

She then claimed she was the only person on the stage to have “beaten an incumbent Republican any time in the past 30 years.”

The next time Bernie got an opportunity to speak, he completely demolished this claim, noting that he beat an incumbent Republican in 1990.

Warren was then left gawping with her mouth open as she failed to grasp the fact that 1990 (November 1990 to be exact) was in fact within the past 30 years.

The real reason Warren refused to shake Bernie’s hand was because Bernie completely humiliated her and made her look totally incapable of doing basic math.

This completely undermined Warren’s ‘girl power’ schtick by making her look stupid and fulfilling many of the stereotypes about women in politics that her entire approach to the topic was meant to extinguish.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter:

———————————————————————————————————————

My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.

Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

———————————————————————————————————————

Politics

Leftists Carrying Champagne Bottles Celebrate Death of Prince Philip Outside Buckingham Palace

Flee when they’re caught on camera.

Published

on

Video Screenshot

A pair of leftists were caught on camera outside Buckingham Palace carrying champagne bottles in an apparent effort to celebrate the death of Prince Philip before hastily retreating when they realized they were being filmed.

YouTuber Mahyar Tousi spotted the vile behavior, tweeting, “A couple of attention seekers with bottles of champagne being disrespectful outside Buckingham Palace.”

When confronted, one of the individuals said they were engaging in a “celebration of death.”

After being told that they were being recorded, he is then heard to say, “Alright, let’s go.”

Following the announcement of the death of the Duke of Edinburgh, tributes poured forth for Great Britain’s longest ever serving consort, but sick ghouls on the left immediately began cheering his demise.

Innumerable Twitter users wasted no time in crudely celebrating the death of the Royal, trashing Prince Philip because he committed the sin decades ago of uttering what today’s hyper-woke society would deem to be “racist” comments.

Meanwhile, police have urged people to stay away from paying respects at Buckingham Palace due to COVID lockdown rules, while there will be no state funeral for Prince Philip for the same reason.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter:

———————————————————————————————————————

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

PJW Shop

ALERT!

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, I urgently need your financial support here.

———————————————————————————————————————

Continue Reading

Politics

AP Wording Suggests Vehicle Killed Capitol Police Veteran, Not Murderer Behind the Wheel

Mealy mouthed wording once again shifts the blame.

Published

on

ERIC BARADAT via Getty Images

The Associated Press was criticized for how it worded a tweet about the U.S. Capitol Police veteran who was killed last week, shifting the blame onto the vehicle rather than the murderer behind the wheel.

As soon as news broke of an attack on the Capitol on Friday, leftist commentators rushed to blame white people as they do after every single mass shooting or act of violence.

However, the culprit was soon named as 25-year-old Noah Green, a black Nation of Islam follower. He was shot dead by cops after launching a vehicle and knife attack that left Officer William Evans fighting for his life. Evans subsequently succumbed to his injuries in hospital.

According to the AP, Green didn’t ram the vehicle into Evans, the vehicle apparently controlled itself.

“The U.S. Capitol Police veteran killed last week is being remembered as a man with a sense of humor who loved sports and was most proud of being a dad. William Evans died when a car rammed into him and another officer at a barricade near the Capitol,” stated the tweet.

“I’m confused, this tweet is missing information about the race of the perpetrator. Is this not an important detail?” asked one respondent.

“People dont kill people, cars do,” responded Tim Pool.

“Journalists are at it again,” lamented Jack Posobiec.

One wonders if the reporting would have been phrased differently if a right-wing extremist had committed the murder.

This is by no means the first time media outlets have used mealy mouthed wording to shield the perpetrators of violence.

Throughout the entire summer, CNN and others repeatedly referred to Black Lives Matter rioting, looting and burning down of buildings as “mostly peaceful.”

BBC News also dropped a clanger when the broadcaster tweeted, “27 police officers injured during largely peaceful anti-racism protests in London.”

Which is like saying “thousands killed after largely peaceful September flight.”

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter:

———————————————————————————————————————

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

PJW Shop

ALERT!

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, I urgently need your financial support here.

———————————————————————————————————————

Continue Reading

Politics

USA Today ‘Race and Inclusion’ Editor Fired For Falsely Blaming White People For Boulder Shooting

Responds by saying USA Today is racist.

Published

on

ALASTAIR PIKE via Getty Images

A ‘race and inclusion’ editor was fired by USA Today after she falsely blamed the Boulder supermarket shooting on white people.

“It’s always an angry white man. Always,” tweeted Hemal Jhaveri on Monday evening immediately after news of the shooting broke.

The gunman was named the next day as 21-year-old Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, a migrant from Syria.

“Hi friends. Some news,” tweeted Jhaveri earlier today. “I am no longer working at For The Win and USA TODAY. Here’s what happened.”

In a Medium piece about her dismissal, Jhaveri explains that even after seeing a picture of the shooter, she tweeted a “dashed off over-generalization” about the culprit.

“It was a careless error of judgment, sent at a heated time, that doesn’t represent my commitment to racial equality,” Jhaveri said. “I regret sending it. I apologized and deleted the tweet.”

In Jhaveri’s world, “racial equality” apparently means blaming an entire race of people for the actions of one violent Islamist.

However, Jhaveri thinks that her firing wasn’t specifically in relation to that tweet, but to others in which she was “publicly naming whiteness as a defining problem.” She also referenced a 2017 tweet in which she called out “a reporter’s white privilege” as another reason for her dismissal.

“My previous tweets were flagged not for inaccuracy or for political bias, but for publicly naming whiteness as a defining problem,” Jhaveri said. “That is something USA TODAY, and many other newsrooms across the country, can not tolerate.”

The now unemployed journalist also claimed she was the victim of racist “microaggressions” carried out by “majority white” USA Today staff during her 8 year run with the media outlet.

Jhaveri also complained about a standards and ethics meeting in which an editor “argued it was OK to deadname transgender people” (the horror).

“I could go on,” Jhaveri said. “Over almost 8 years, plenty of incidents have piled up.”

“This is not about bias, or keeping personal opinions off of Twitter. It’s about challenging whiteness and being punished for it,” Jhaveri wrote.

“Like many places, USA TODAY values ‘equality and inclusion,’ but only as long as it knows its rightful place, which is subservient to white authority,” she added.

By the sounds of it, I’m sure everyone at USA Today will sorely miss Jhaveri’s “inclusive” presence.

Jhaveri wasn’t the only journalist to let slip anti-white racism in the aftermath of the shooting – literally countless others posted similar tweets.

None of them appear to have been fired.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter:

———————————————————————————————————————

ALERT!

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, I urgently need your financial support here.

———————————————————————————————————————

Continue Reading

Trending