crime

Pics Of Clinton Aboard Epstein’s Pedo Plane Emerge

Published

2 years ago

9 January, 2020

Steve Watson

composite

Bill seen posing with ‘sex slave’

It has been well documented that Bill Clinton flew on dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet some 26 occasions, now photos have emerged showing the former President on board and posing with an alleged sex slave.

WORLD EXCLUSIVE: Bill Clinton poses with Epstein’s ‘pimp’ Ghislaine Maxwell and a sex slave on board private jet the ‘Lolita Express’ https://t.co/dxIyqDy953

— The US Sun (@TheSunUS) January 8, 2020

The pictures, obtained by The Sun, show Clinton relaxing on the so called ‘Lolita Express’, the Boeing 727 plane that is thought to have been used for sex trafficking.

In one picture, Clinton is seen posing with Ghislaine Maxwell, allegedly Epstein’s go to ‘pimp’.

In another picture, Clinton poses with his arm around Massage therapist Chauntae Davies, one of Epstein’s so called ‘sex slaves’.

The images were taken during a 2002 Africa trip in connection with the Clinton Foundation, according to the report.

Davies has said that she was serially raped and sexually assaulted at the hands of Epstein, but has not made any such claims against Clinton.

Davies said that “Clinton was a great guy on the trip. He’d sit around on the plane with a cigar in his mouth, playing cards between flights.”

“I wrote in my journal at the time that I wished he could be president again. He was charismatic and funny and kind and personable.” She added.

“Looking back at these images now it raises a lot of questions about why Bill Clinton was using the plane and what perhaps Jeffrey may have been trying to accomplish by having him around.” she told reporters.

While there is no incriminating evidence contained within the pictures, and no indication that Clinton was aware of Epstein’s activities, they will certainly add fuel to the theories involving elites and pedophilia.

crime

“Paedos & Propaganda”: Man Attacks BBC Statue Sculpted by Child Molester

Legal precedent made for anyone to engage in iconoclasm, so long as they’re ‘offended’.

Published

4 days ago

12 January, 2022

Paul Joseph Watson

Leon Neal via Getty Images

A man scaled the facade of a statue that was sculpted by a child molester outside BBC headquarters in London, defacing it with the words “paedos and propaganda.”

A protester carrying a hammer used an ordinary ladder to reach the monument, which was erected in 1933 by artist Eric Gill, who in 1989 was revealed to have sexually abused his daughters, sister and family dog.

As he chipped away at the statue, the man told police the statue should have been removed “decades ago.”

The man was subsequently arrested after a four hour standoff, with a crane being used to remove him from the 10 foot statue, which represents The Tempest character Ariel as a naked young boy.

“Gill’s statue has garnered controversy since its installation 88 years ago, when critics voiced concern over the size of the boy’s genitalia – prompting the tabling of a question in the House of Commons,” reports the Telegraph.

He is still up there and honestly doesn’t seem to be making much progress. I’m no expert, but bringing a hammer and no chisel seems like a lack of forward planning pic.twitter.com/BXkX22opyy

— Charlie Haynes (@charliehtweets) January 12, 2022

Many have questioned why the BBC itself didn’t remove the statue, particularly after revelations that the broadcaster had facilitated the cover up of the Jimmy Saville pedophile scandal.

Another statue made by Gill is situated inside the BBC building itself, although that hasn’t been removed either.

Last week, four left-wing activists were cleared of criminal damage for pulling down a statue of slave-trader Edward Colston in Bristol during a Black Lives Matter protest.

This set the legal precedent that anyone can now destroy public art or works of heritage without punishment, so long as they claim to be offended.

“Coming just a week after the Colston verdict, this attack demonstrates that it was indeed a ‘vandal’s charter’ placing all of our built heritage at increased risk,” said Robert Poll, founder of the campaign group Save Our Statues.

“We have now entered a new age of barbarism, where the value of art is judged only by the politics imposed upon it, and destruction is considered progressive,” he added.

We undermine the rule of law, which underpins our democracy, if we accept vandalism and criminal damage are acceptable forms of political protest.

They aren’t. Regardless of the intentions. https://t.co/JsOj0kNgWq

— Robert Jenrick (@RobertJenrick) January 5, 2022

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

———————————————————————————————————————

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

ALERT!

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.

———————————————————————————————————————

crime

UK Government Greases Skids For Fleets of Surveillance Drones Over Cities

By launching cynical PR stunt asserting it’s about protecting women.

Published

2 weeks ago

3 January, 2022

Paul Joseph Watson

Buena Vista Images via Getty Images

In what appears to be a cynical PR stunt, the UK government is considering plans to allow women who feel threatened on the street to call upon surveillance drones that would arrive in minutes and shine a bright light on any potential attacker.

What could possibly go wrong?

“Women in fear of an attack will be able to use a phone app to summon a drone, which could arrive within minutes armed with a powerful spotlight and thermal cameras to frighten off any potential assailant,” reports the Telegraph.

Trials will take place on campus at Nottingham University at a cost of £500,000 during which the tech will be used to “protect students and staff.”

The scheme will be submitted to the UK government’s Innovate research program, and could eventually see helicopters being replaced by drones as a front line tool of law enforcement.

“It is a high capability drone that costs just £100 an hour but can do 80 percent of what a police helicopter can do,” said Richard Gill, the founder of Drone Defence. “It cannot do high speed pursuits but it can do the other tasks such as searching for people and ground surveillance.”

Gill noted that 25 drones could do the job of one police helicopter in London for the same price, with the drones being housed at five base locations across the city.

The idea of countless government drones whizzing around a city keeping tabs on people is garishly dystopian.

Allowing individuals to access the drones would also be completely open to abuse and misuse.

Innumerable people would make a mockery of the system by constantly calling upon the drones to harass random people or use the drones for target practice.

A far more effective means of preventing such attacks would be to allow women to be armed with pepper spray, but current law in the UK makes that illegal.

Changing the law would give women the power to defend themselves while avoiding the dystopian nightmare that state surveillance drones would bring.

The idea of giving women who feel threatened the power to summon drones is patently a cynical PR stunt to acclimatize the public into accepting the general introduction of drones as a tool of mass surveillance.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

———————————————————————————————————————

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

ALERT!

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.

———————————————————————————————————————