censorship
UN Moves Towards Handing Dictatorships Power to Control the Internet
Legitimizing web blackouts and free speech censorship.
The United Nations wants to hand power to dictatorial regimes like China to control the Internet, prompting fears of a massive new free speech purge.
The General Assembly has approved a resolution sponsored by China and Russia to set up a committee of “international experts” whose role would be to stop “the use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes.”
However, many caution that the move is merely a back door for authoritarian regimes to further censor dissent.
“The United States, European powers and rights groups fear that the language is code for legitimizing crackdowns on expression, with numerous countries defining criticism of the government as “criminal,” reports AFP.
Human Rights Watch said the list of sponsors for the resolution is “a rogue’s gallery of some of the earth’s most repressive governments” and “gives countries legal cover for internet blackouts and censorship, while creating the potential for criminalizing free speech.”
Governments like China already censor and turn off the Internet during times of civil unrest while doling out ‘social credit score’ punishments for those who criticize the state.
The Communist country is also rolling out a plan to force its citizens to pass a facial recognition test to use the Internet. Criticized the authorities? No Internet for you.
We predicted that all this would come to fruition nearly 10 years ago in an article entitled ‘Cybersecurity Measures Will Mandate Government “ID Tokens” To Use The Internet’.
“Under the guise of “cybersecurity,” the government is moving to discredit and shut down the existing Internet infrastructure in the pursuit of a new, centralized, regulated world wide web,” I wrote in June 2010.
The fact that the United Nations is attempting to legitimize this framework by handing oppressive regimes more power to define certain types of speech as criminal is part of a long term agenda.
As we previously highlighted, the United Nations global compact on migration expanded the definition of ‘hate speech’ to make it a crime to criticize mass immigration.
Under a second Trump administration the U.S. is almost certain to ignore any UN attempt to impose its hegemony over the Internet, but if the Democrats win in 2020 it could be a very different story.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————
The narrative that legions of fans based in England sent racist messages to black footballers was a manufactured moral panic. It never happened.
The vast majority of the messages were sent from South Asia and the Middle East.
But now the state gets more power and the mob can increase its ideological purges.
Please share this video! https://youtu.be/Rmc12n5uCPU
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————
censorship
Critics Point to Country of Origin After Controversy Over Racist Messages Sent to Black England Footballers
Evidence clearly suggests most comments come from India and the Middle East.
After a controversy surrounding racist messages sent to black England footballers led to calls for people to be forced to provide identity documents to create a social media account, some pointed to evidence suggesting the vast majority of the messages were posted by users from South Asia and the Middle East.
Italy beat England on penalties to win the Euro 2020 tournament on Sunday night after three black players missed three of England’s penalties.
Some claimed that manager Gareth Southgate deliberately chose black players to take the last three crucial kicks in an effort to send a political message in support of “diversity” and anti-racism.
However, after England lost, reports of the Instagram and Twitter accounts of the three players being flooded with racial slurs and monkey emojis immediately began to circulate.
This then led to calls for the government to hunt down the identities of those responsible, with authorities vowing to “make an example of” the culprits.
A petition that calls for the government to pass a law that mandates people provide a verified ID before they are able to open a social media account currently has over 633,000 signatures.
However, critics have pointed out anecdotal evidence before the comments were deleted showing that the vast majority didn’t come from England fans, but from people located in the Middle East and South Asia.
“The biggest thing about the racial abuse of footballers in England that always gets cut from the narrative is that most of it comes from abroad,” commented Charlie Peters.
This doesn’t suit the view that England is a racist backwater that despises some of its greatest citizens, so it’s cast aside.
But if you cut away that factor, the abuse all but vanishes. This is not a homegrown problem.
— Charlie Peters (@CDP1882) July 12, 2021
“This doesn’t suit the view that England is a racist backwater that despises some of its greatest citizens, so it’s cast aside,” he added. “But if you cut away that factor, the abuse all but vanishes. This is not a homegrown problem.”
Tory MP Michael Fabricant is also calling on UK Home Secretary Priti Patel to “investigate what proportion of the racist abuse directed at England players after the Euros actually originated in the UK.”
🚨 | NEW: Tory MP Michael Fabricant has asked Priti Patel to investigate what proportion of the racist abuse directed at England players after the Euros actually originated in the UK
— Politics For All (@PoliticsForAlI) July 13, 2021
The media and leftists are loathe to consider the origin of the racist comments because it doesn’t fit their narrative that racism is only a problem in white countries.
Many people are still somehow unable to grasp or refuse to accept that racism also exists in non-white countries (and is almost always worse).
Virtually every time a black football player faces abuse, the vast majority of those making the comments have Indian or Middle Eastern names.
I’m so disgusted with these messages posted to Saka and Rashford’s social media pages! Don’t call yourself fans…you are racist arseholes! Now perhaps people will understand why they kneel! @England pic.twitter.com/gEBeyOsW8a
— Kerry Gleadle (@KerryGleadle) July 11, 2021
A previous investigation by the Premier League found that “social media abuse of top tier footballers originates outside the UK in seven out of ten cases.”
Indeed, a SEMrush analysis of racist comments and emojis posted in the hours after the match ended show that the top countries of origin are India, United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
— Daniel Bostock (@DanielBostock4) July 13, 2021
The establishment is completely disinterested in identifying the true culprits behind the comments because it was demolish the narrative that racist white English people were to blame.
It would also deflate attempts to exploit the contrived problem to expand state power and control over the Internet while eliminating online anonymity.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.
———————————————————————————————————————
censorship
Canada’s National Archive Cancels Country’s First Prime Minister
History will be “rewritten.”
Canada’s national archive has effectively canceled the country’s first Prime Minister Sir John Alexander Macdonald by deleting a page about him because it was “offensive” and didn’t represent Canada as “diverse and multicultural.”
“Sir John Alexander Macdonald, born in Scotland, was Canada’s first prime minister. He is famous for his role in the establishment of Canada as a country on July 1 1867. Some of his other notable achievements include building the Canadian Pacific Railway and forming a strong Conservative Party,” writes Dan Frieth.
However, it is Macdonald’s role in passing the Indian Act, which mandated that children from indigenous tribes assimilate into Christian boarding schools, that has drawn the ire of far-left activists.
The government’s establishment of the Chinese Immigration Act in 1885, which limited the entrance of Chinese immigrants into Canada by charging them a head tax of $50 each, is also apparently grounds for Macdonald’s cancellation.
After an unknown number of complaints (it may have been just one), Canada’s national archive website apologized and vowed to remove all offending material about Macdonald and any other historical figure who upsets 21st century woke imbeciles.
“Our current website contains information that was written many years ago,” states a notice posted on the website.
“Unfortunately, it does not always reflect our diverse and multicultural country, often presenting one side of Canada’s history.”
“Library Archives Canada acknowledges that some of its online presence is offensive and continues to correct these issues. That is why content that is redundant or outdated will be removed or rewritten.”
In other words, history will be “rewritten” to satiate the mob.
As we previously highlighted, while Canada is canceling its historical figures, representation for the LGBT movement is more ingrained than ever before.
The Canadian government recently announced that it is expanding ‘Pride Month’ for the entire summer and calling it ‘Pride Season’.
Meanwhile, the mob is also toppling statues of Queen Elizabeth II and Queen Victoria outside legislatures because they are symbols of the country’s past.
Good luck, Canada.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.
———————————————————————————————————————
-
Coronavirus2 days agoMacron Announces Those Without ‘COVID Vaccine Pass’ Will be Banned From Routine Life Activities
-
Coronavirus2 days agoDemocrat Groups Plan to ‘Fact Check’ Private SMS Messages
-
Black Lives Matter19 hours agoLightning Strike Destroys George Floyd Mural in Toledo
-
clownworld3 days agoUK Library Forced to Apologize After Hiring Man in Monkey Dildo Costume to Perform in Front of Children
-
Coronavirus7 days agoVideo: White House Says “STRIKE FORCES” Being Sent To Get Kids Vaccinated
-
Coronavirus6 days agoJust 25 Under 18’s Died From COVID in England, Hundreds Died From Suicide and Trauma
-
Coronavirus6 days agoRand Paul Says He Will Introduce Bill To Scrap Mask Mandate ‘Farce’
-
censorship2 days agoCritics Point to Country of Origin After Controversy Over Racist Messages Sent to Black England Footballers