Australian police are using a brutal ambush on two cops to encourage residents to rat out neighbors who are skeptical of the Covid-10 vaccine, or harbor anti-government views.

On December 12, two Brisbane police officers were gunned down by a family of rural Australians, who opened fire as the two officers approached their home. Constables Rachel McCrow, 29, and Matthew Arnold, 26 died in the attack, while a third officer, Constable Randall Kirk, was shot in the leg but managed to escape. A fourth officer, Keely Brough, fled to safety in the bushes.

Later that evening, members of the rural family were killed in a shootout with tactical police.

In response to the incident, Deputy Commissioner Tracy Linford suggested that neighbors need to assume anyone who harbors non-mainstream views is clearly a threat.

“As I said before, if there’s anybody out there that knows of someone that might be showing concerning behavior around conspiracy theories, anti-government, anti-police, conspiracy theories around COVID-19 vaccination as what we’re seeing with [shooting perpetrators] the Train family, we’d want to know about it. We want to know about that. And you can either contact the police directly or go through Crime Stoppers,” she said.

In response, Rebel News‘ Avi Yemini replied: “Queensland Police appealing to the public to dob in their neighbours who “are anti-government or believe Covid-19 vaccine conspiracy theories.””

🚨Queensland Police appealing to the public to dob in their neighbours who “are anti-government or believe Covid-19 vaccine conspiracy theories”.

ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION YET?!

pic.twitter.com/7Hcnoz54iX

— Avi Yemini (@OzraeliAvi) December 26, 2022

This has not sat well with many:

1984 in 2022. What kind of world do they want to live in. What kind of world do they want to leave for future generations.

— Nole (@skyxxngd) December 26, 2022

We are allowed to oppose the government and police.

— Alèquin the Great (@AlequinGreat) December 26, 2022

Here is the neighbours pic.twitter.com/HLUsSgQHPO

— Sydney965🧙‍♀️♏️🔮🌸 (@sydney9651) December 26, 2022

Authoritarianism, and totalitarianism, at its finest…

Bravo @ausgov, you’re making it less likely for any sort of tourism to occur in Australia…

There was a time that I, and many others , dreamt of visiting Australia…@ausgov police, you are a disgrace.

Happy Chanukah!

— Reliable Brain 🇺🇸 (@ReliableBrain) December 26, 2022

This post was originally published at Zero Hedge

A video of the Brittney Griner prisoner exchange between Russian and U.S. officials was mysteriously edited, prompting speculation that the State Department edited out a handshake between the athlete and the Russian terrorist she was traded for.

Internet sleuths are suggesting the weird cut in the footage comes right as Griner was posturing herself to shake the hand of arms dealer Viktor Bout, known as the ‘Merchant of Death’.

Bout was convicted on terrorism charges over a decade ago for attempting to sell missiles worth tens of millions of dollars to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), specifically for the purpose of shooting down U.S. Military helicopters.

You can tell Griner went in for a handshake with Viktor Bout and it was completely edited out. Watch her body language just before the edit. https://t.co/pNHar7lEjA

— Rob Schmitt (@SchmittNYC) December 8, 2022

There's a jump cut here at :13 as everyone is shaking hands and hugging and right before it looks like Griner maybe going in to shake hands with Bout? https://t.co/UGNPPbG37w

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) December 8, 2022

The optics of Griner shaking Bout’s hand wouldn’t play too well for the Biden administration, which is already being heavily criticised for making such a horrible deal, and leaving behind other U.S. prisoners including Marine veteran Paul Whelan.

President Trump responds to the HORRIBLE Brittney Griner trade. pic.twitter.com/JQ7Ey23pZR

— Alex Bruesewitz 🇺🇸 (@alexbruesewitz) December 8, 2022

Even Democrats are slating the administration’s actions:

Top Democrat Senator Blasts Biden Over Releasing Terrorist For Griner: ‘Deeply Disturbing Decision’ https://t.co/mXXzyD3cIT

— Daily Wire News (@DailyWireNews) December 8, 2022

Far right wing Senator Bob Menendez “Senator Blasts Biden Over Releasing Terrorist For Griner: ‘Deeply Disturbing Decision’ https://t.co/wmzyPKAcPh

— Rich Zeoli 🇺🇸 (@Richzeoli) December 9, 2022

Fox News reporter Peter Doocy asked the White House Press Secretary “Why did Russia get such a better deal?” to which she replied, it was that deal or nothing.

“In bringing home a professional athlete, we gave up a prolific arms dealer who was convicted of trying to kill Americans who’s called the ‘Merchant of Death,’” Doocy bluntly noted.

Another reporter asked how on earth this doesn’t send a message to Russia and other authoritarian regimes that all they have to do is kidnap Americans in order to broker a deal to get their criminal scum back.

Of course, she had no answer.

“How does this deal not send a message to Russia and to other governments that if they wrongfully detain American[s] … they will have some of their most dangerous criminals, in this case the ‘Merchant of Death,’ released?”

Jean-Pierre: “I cannot speak for other countries.” pic.twitter.com/zN6Z9dLF6V

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) December 8, 2022

But hey, lets not miss an opportunity to alphabet and race virtue signal:

KJP: "The choice was bring Brittney home or no one. The president will never stop working to secure Paul Whelan's release. On a personal note, Brittney is an important role model, an inspiration to millions of Americans particularly the LGBTQI+ Americans and women of color" pic.twitter.com/ClbGi6ysbq

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) December 8, 2022

Don Lemon says Brittney Griner’s release is a big deal for the LGBT community. Because no one else has ever gotten sentenced to prison on drug charges, right?

pic.twitter.com/f9l4jBic9F

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) December 8, 2022

If Brittney Griner was a conservative, she would still be locked up. https://t.co/zf9BjsPqcx

— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) December 8, 2022

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

———————————————————————————————————————
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

New Zealand’s High Court on Wednesday took custody of an infant whose parents demanded he only receive blood from donors who are unvaccinated against Covid-19 for an urgently needed heart surgery to repair a congenital defect.

“He remains in urgent need of an operation, and every day that the operation is delayed his heart is under strain,” reads the order, citing one of his doctors.

The parents, Cole Reeves and Samantha Savage, rejected doctors’ assertion that using blood donated from outside normal channels was “impractical” for the child’s circumstance, and that surgery without donated blood was “not an available option.”

“That Is Where Tyranny Starts”: New Zealand May Take Baby From Parents Demanding ‘Unvaccinated’ Blood For Heart Surgery

Apparently an unvaccinated volunteer with the same blood type is not ‘an available option.’

Judge Ian Gault ruled that it was in “Baby W’s best interests” for the court to take temporary custody of him so the surgery could be performed. The infant was placed under the guardianship of the court from Wednesday until he recovers from surgery, but not beyond January 31st, the Washington Post reports.

The surgery, which is set for Friday morning, is estimated to take 48 hours to complete. Two doctors were appointed as Baby W’s legal representatives for the purpose of consenting to surgery, and Reeves and Savage were appointed as his representatives for “all other purposes.” Doctors said they would “take the parents’ views into consideration” whenever possible — as long as doing so wouldn’t compromise “Baby W’s interests.”

The decision followed a tense period of several weeks fraught with baseless claims, according to the order. -WaPo

Reeves and Savage how now tried to stop doctors preparing the infant for the operation on Friday – which the High Court responded to by ordering the parents not to obstruct staff at Starship Hospital.

Te Whatu Ora has asked for the police to step in and also asked the court if officers are entitled to use reasonable force to remove the baby from the parents. 

In his decision yesterday, Justice Gault also said doctors from Te Whatu Ora had been made agents of the court to carry out the surgery, including the adminstration of any blood products.

In a minute issued this evening, Justice Gault said he had been informed by the lawyer acting for Te Whatu Ora that the baby’s parents had prevented doctors from taking blood tests, performing a chest X-ray and performing an anaesthetic assessment.

The lawyer understood the parents had threatened to lay criminal charges against medical staff if they went ahead, Justice Gault said. –RNZ

“You touch our child and we will press criminal charges against you,” the parents told hospital staff, according to the filing.

The parents’ lawyer, Sue Grey, petitioned the judge, asking for the opinions of two US doctors to be considered, adding that it would be “extreme overreach” if police were called in to remove the baby from his parents in order to perform the surgery.

Justice Gault denied the request, saying Grey was effectively seeking to re-open the case he had already ruled on.

“Baby W urgently requires surgery and, as I concluded in my judgment, an order enabling the surgery to proceed using NZBS [New Zealand Blood Service] blood products without further delay is in Baby W’s best interests,” wrote Gault.

This post was originally published at Zero Hedge