While the media continues to fret about “racist” bat soup memes, a Muslim cleric just issued a fatwa celebrating the coronavirus outbreak and calling for the “annihilation” of Chinese people.

On January 23rd last month, Syrian jihadi cleric Abd Al-Razzaq Al-Mahdi celebrated the spread of coronavirus in China and urged Muslims to pray for Allah to “annihilate” the people of China.

“Al-Mahdi is a prominent cleric who is well respected by jihadi factions, and who is known for his sermons and fatwas, in which he encourages Muslims to take part in jihad and carry out attacks inside Russia,” reports MEMRI.

Titled ‘Fatwas from the Land of Sham’ – Al-Mahdi was responding to a question from Muhammad Abu Nassir, who asked, “Is it permissible that we express our joy for what China is experiencing – the coronavirus and the death of the Chinese people?”

“Yes, yes we should express our joy and pray for their annihilation,” responded Al-Mahdi. “They [the Chinese] have declared resounding war and they killed, slaughtered, imprisoned, and oppressed the Uyghurs and non-Uyghur Muslims. They are the enemies of Allah and are Buddhists and communists.”

Al-Mahdi’s fatwa was issued via Telegram, but he is also apparently active on Twitter, which presumably permits jihadist fatwas yet just banned Zero Hedge for questioning the official story on the coronavirus outbreak.

Al-Mahdi’s fatwa is apparently not as newsworthy as the media’s primary obsession – patrolling “racist” bat soup memes.

There have been innumerable articles published over the last 10 days suggesting that the spread of bigotry in the form of criticism of Chinese people’s bizarre dietary habits is more concerning than the spread of the global coronavirus epidemic.

The fact remains; Whatever the source of the coronavirus (the source of both Ebola and SARS was bats), eating bats, dogs, pulling the intestines out of live frogs and dipping baby mice in sauce then chomping down on their wriggling bodies – is all objectively disgusting.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

———————————————————————————————————————

My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.

Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

———————————————————————————————————————

20-year-old Islamic terrorist Sudesh Amman, who was shot dead after trying to stab people in Streatham, south London yesterday, was released halfway through his prison sentence despite pledging allegiance to ISIS, encouraging his girlfriend to behead her parents and sharing a tutorial on homemade bombs.

Amman stabbed two people during the attack in broad daylight on Sunday afternoon before he was quickly neutralized by plain clothed anti-terror police who had been monitoring him.

In November 2018, Amman was sentenced to three years and four months in jail for a string of terror offences, which included;

– Pledging allegiance to ISIS
– Plotting to carry out a terror attack using a knife
– Sharing terror manuals, including one on how to make a homemade bomb
– Encouraging his girlfriend to behead her “kuffar” (non-believer) parents
– Stockpiling arms
– Inciting violence toward Yazidis and asserting the Koran permitted them to be raped
– Encouraging an “attack” against a pro-gay rights speaker in Hyde Park.

However, despite all of this, Amman was released a few days ago, halfway through his sentence, and immediately planned to carry out a terror attack.

Amman’s case bears many similarities to that of Usman Khan, the perpetrator of the November 2019 London Bridge stabbings.

Like Amman, Khan had been released early from his prison sentence for terrorist offences, including a plot to kill Boris Johnson and bomb the London Stock Exchange. Despite being banned from entering London, Khan was given a day release to attend a course to “help offenders reintegrate into society.”

One of Khan’s victims, Jack Merritt, was a coordinator for the ‘Learning Together’ course. Merritt’s father reacted to his death by asserting his son “would not wish his death to be used as the pretext for more draconian sentences or for detaining people unnecessarily.”

Some reacted to yesterday’s attack by pointing out that Amman had left jail even more radicalized than when he went in, proving that prisons with large Muslim populations are recruiting grounds for terrorists.

Amman was being held at HMP Belmarsh, a maximum security facility described by one former inmate as being “like a jihadi training camp.” Usman Khan was also imprisoned at Belmarsh.

According to the former inmate, Belmarsh is occupied by a group of Islamists called ‘the Brothers’ (the Akhi ) who “almost have the run of the prison.”

“The problem is that Belmarsh is also a holding prison and so young people who are brainwashed and indoctrinated then go out into the wider prison system and create wider Akhi networks,” said the inmate.

Over the past five years, the Muslim percentage of the prison population has doubled to 30 per cent.

“This trend is London-wide,” reports the London Evening Standard. “At HMP Isis in Thamesmead and Feltham Young Offenders’ Institute, Muslims now comprise 42 and 34 per cent of prisoners respectively, despite Muslims amounting to just 12 per cent of London’s population.”

Meanwhile, mass immigration from Muslim countries into the UK will continue in substantial numbers, with the Muslim population set to triple within 30 years.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet

———————————————————————————————————————

My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.

Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

———————————————————————————————————————

Violent Islamists stormed the US embassy in Iraq and were labelled ‘protesters’ and ‘mourners’ by the US media

The leftist media in the US started off 2020 with a cacophony of fake news Wednesday by labeling Hezbollah terrorists who attempted to storm the US embassy in Baghdad as ‘protesters’.

The pictures from the mob attack clearly show that it was led by members of Tehran’s militia units in Iraq which have been absorbed into the Iraqi security forces.

Early reports detailed that the violent horde was being led by Iranian backed militia group Kata’ib Hezbollah:

Kata'ib Hezbollah is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and the attack should be treated as a terrorist attack and not a bunch of "protesters" getting out of controlhttps://t.co/do8GT83AKX https://t.co/ypsbg3zmoB

— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) December 31, 2019

The assault on the embassy was a response to US airstrikes targeting Iran-backed militants in Iraq and Syria who killed a U.S. military contractor last week.

The violent Islamist terrorists chanted “No, no to America, no, no to Israel,” while storming the building and setting it on fire.

This is all clear as day, yet take a look at The Washington Post’s front page Wednesday:

For The Washington Post, Hezbollah terrorists =“protesters”

Yep, 2020 will be no different than 2019 for The Post. https://t.co/nu8GlBhdnO

— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) January 1, 2020

Calling Iranian backed militias using battering rams and setting fire to the building in the photo protesters

This is why no one trusts the media

They were siding with terrorists hoping for another Benghazi. But instead President Trump acted swiftly and sent in the Marines. https://t.co/TqMYLrzxNS

— Comfortably Smug (@ComfortablySmug) January 1, 2020

Every time members of the media blame Trump for their own lack of credibility, rather than looking in the mirror … https://t.co/elwIryd1EF

— Geoffrey Ingersoll (@GPIngersoll) January 1, 2020

And it begins by calling violent Islamists "protesters." https://t.co/YESF2DFEyo

— NewsBusters (@newsbusters) January 1, 2020

The picture clearly shows these are members of Tehran's militia units in Iraq which are now part of Iraqi security forces. Washington Post and New York Times lose their credibility by acting as anti-US propaganda machines. https://t.co/a3rhGN3QkB

— Saeed Ghasseminejad (@SGhasseminejad) January 1, 2020

Protesters? They were members of a pro-Iranian militia that has attacked, killed and wounded Americans. https://t.co/sS2lw48Ihz

— Nicholas Burns (@RNicholasBurns) January 1, 2020

Back in the 1970s and 80s they called the Iranian aggressors “students” so protesters being used now is not surprising. https://t.co/vqgHsps3zo

— Joe Warmington (@joe_warmington) January 1, 2020

I dunno, WaPo. When the protesters are wearing combat fatigues, it's maybe a signal that something else is going on. https://t.co/g8A1bF3nxB

— Tom Gara (@tomgara) January 1, 2020

Others noticed the mis-spelling of ‘terrorists’ or ‘militiamen’:

The editor spelled "militiamen" wrong. These vandals have nothing to do with the ongoing peaceful protesters in Iraq, killed and kidnapped by members of this militia https://t.co/fmznA1lI6u

— Elizabeth Tsurkov (@Elizrael) January 1, 2020

Some noted how the Post was almost as dishonest as CNN, which had earlier called the mob ‘Iraqi mourners’:

And WaPo kicks the New Year off with Fake News.

They were Iran-Backed Terrorists.

Not “Protesters” or “Iraqi Mourners”

How are they so bad at this? https://t.co/AjcOqYYHiS

— ALX 🇺🇸 (@alx) January 1, 2020

"Protesters"?? 🤣😂

They're almost as dishonest as @CNN is. That's quite a feat! https://t.co/IfZ4k42zUt

— David Wohl (@DavidWohl) January 1, 2020

The New York Times also got in on the ‘mourners’ debacle:

Hundreds of Iraqi mourners tried to storm the United States Embassy in Baghdad, shouting “Down, down USA!,” in response to deadly American airstrikes this week that killed 25 fighters https://t.co/jrAtON72eR

— The New York Times (@nytimes) December 31, 2019

“Mourners.” It’s not hard to see which side the New York Times sympathizes with here https://t.co/kjcPW9XTd7

— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) December 31, 2019

The Times later repeated the ‘protesters’ description:

For months, furious protests have battered Iraq, driven by the pervasive influence of a foreign power: Iran. But now protesters have turned their sights on the U.S. So what happened? https://t.co/dV6LtWPl4Y

— New York Times World (@nytimesworld) January 1, 2020

In reality, protests have been going on for months against Iran’s influence in Iraq. The real Iraqi protesters are against the very people who attacked the embassy. The pro-Iranian militia have even been killing those protesters.

However, the NY Times is lumping them all in the same basket.

The media also claimed that President Trump was golfing instead of paying attention to the potentially deadly situation at the embassy.

The Fake News said I played golf today, and I did NOT! I had meeting in various locations, while closely monitoring the U.S. Embassy situation in Iraq, which I am still doing. The Corrupt Lamestream Media knew this but, not surprisingly, failed to report or correct!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 31, 2019

Why is the media covering for a group of America-hating terrorists?