Connect with us

Politics

Left-Wing Journalist Says Delay of Harriet Tubman $20 Dollar Bill Proof of “White Supremacy”

New note actually delayed for security reasons.

Published

on

A left-wing journalist with the Atlantic and scores of others believe that the delay of the new $20 dollar bill – which was set to see abolitionist and political activist Harriet Tubman replace Andrew Jackson – is evidence of the Trump’s administration’s “white supremacy”.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin revealed last month that the design of the note would be delayed for technical reasons by six years.

The New York Times claims (with no evidence) that Trump “had intervened to keep his favorite president, Andrew Jackson, a fellow populist, on the front of the note.”

The working design was released today, prompting many leftists to assert that the delay was proof of Trump’s racism.

“The Tubman thing is among the least damaging bad things the Trump administration has done, but the fact that they put so much effort into preventing a *wholly ornamental* gesture against white supremacy tells you a lot about where they’re coming from,” tweeted the Atlantic’s Adam Serwer.

“Further evidence that Trump and his administration officials are racist,” said Dallas Blackburn.

“Worried that the president, because he’s an unhinged racist appealing to racists, will embarrass you and himself by canceling the commemoration of a great American hero, you cancel it preemptively and lie about it,” claimed Kurt Andersen.

“The Trump administration is delaying honoring Harriet Tubman to appease racists,” asserted another Twitter user.

However, according to the Trump administration, the delay has nothing to do with politics.

“Let me assure you, this speculation that we’ve slowed down the process is just not the case,” said Steven Mnuchin.

“There is a group of experts that’s interagency, including the Secret Service and others and B.E.P., that are all career officials that are focused on this,” he said, emphasizing that the release of the new note is dependent on the implementation of new security features.

But don’t let the facts get in the way of another opportunity to whip up race-based hysteria about “white supremacy”.

———————————————————————————————————————

There is a war on free speech. Without your support, my voice will be silenced.

Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

———————————————————————————————————————

Continue Reading
Comments

Politics

Poll: Leftists More Likely to Support Political Violence

Labour & Remain voters approve of milkshaking right-wing politicians.

Published

on

According to a new YouGov poll, Labour Party leftists and Remain voters are more likely to approve of political violence in the form of throwing milkshakes at politicians.

“Imagine a protester threw a milkshake over a candidate from [party]. Would you personally approve or disapprove of this action?” respondents were asked.

As the graphic clearly illustrates, Labour and Remain voters are significantly more likely to approve such attacks in comparison to Leave voters and Conservatives.

Just over half of Labour and Remain voters approve of throwing milkshakes at UKIP and Brexit Party candidates, which is precisely what happened during the EU election campaign.

“Some people argue that throwing milkshakes is a legitimate form of political protest, and should be allowed as an expression of free speech,” states YouGov, seemingly unaware that assaulting someone for having a different opinion doesn’t come under the umbrella of free speech.

But hey, why stop at milkshakes? Comedian Jo Brand ‘joked’ that the next step should be acid attacks on right-wing politicians and the BBC defended her.

———————————————————————————————————————

There is a war on free speech. Without your support, my voice will be silenced.

Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

———————————————————————————————————————

Continue Reading

Politics

Police Investigating Labour Supporter Who Claimed He Burned a Thousand Brexit Party Votes

Labour went on to win election by less than a thousand votes.

Published

on

Police are investigating a Facebook comment by a Labour Party supporter who claimed that he burned a thousand Brexit Party ballot papers before the recent Peterborough by-election and “laughed whilst doing it”.

“She [Lisa Forbes] got nominated (elected) because 3 people including me burned over a [sic] 1000 votes for TBP [The Brexit Party], and laughed while doing it,” said Alan Roddis.

“That is what we have to do to stop fascist scum like [Nigel] Farage never see power,” he added.

null

Labour went on to win the election by just 683 votes, meaning that if the Labour Party supporter’s boast is true, he swung the outcome of the election.

The claim was made “in a closed group called ‘Peterborough Politics’ – a popular local discussion forum on Facebook” which has previously promoted “extreme and anti-semitic ideologies, including many made by local Labour activists,” reports Politicalite.

null

Police are now reportedly investigating the matter after the Brexit Party passed on the information. They also handed it to the press, although coverage has been minimal.

This story should be a national scandal in the United Kingdom, yet no mainstream media outlet dares touch it.

Imagine if a Brexit Party supporter had admitted burning a thousand Labour Party ballot papers and Labour had lost the election by less than a thousand votes.

It would be massive story. As for this, not a peep.

———————————————————————————————————————

There is a war on free speech. Without your support, my voice will be silenced.

Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

———————————————————————————————————————

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump is More Popular Amongst Blacks & Hispanics Than He Was in 2016

Despite being smeared as a racist by the media for the past 3 years.

Published

on

Despite three years of the media incessantly asserting that Donald Trump is a racist, his popularity amongst blacks and Hispanics has increased since 2016.

Exit polling data from 2016 showed Hillary Clinton earning 88 per cent of the black vote compared to Trump’s 8 per cent. This figure was still higher than Mitt Romney’s 6 per cent in 2012.

However, a new poll by Quinnipiac which maps out a hypothetical match up between Joe Biden and Trump shows Trump now has 12 per cent support from African-Americans.

Similarly, Trump’s poll numbers amongst Hispanics have improved.

In 2016, Trump garnered 28 per cent of the Hispanic vote. He now has the support of 33 per cent of Hispanics.

These stats are made all the more remarkable by the fact that the media has smeared Trump as a racist for three years solid. It doesn’t seem to have stuck.

Is this the Kanye effect? The fact that Trump has overseen the lowest black and Hispanic unemployment levels ever, or a combination of both?

———————————————————————————————————————

There is a war on free speech. Without your support, my voice will be silenced.

Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

———————————————————————————————————————

Continue Reading

Trending